Lewis Russell E, Kontoyiannis Dimitrios P, Darouiche Rabih O, Raad Issam I, Prince Randall A
University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Nov;46(11):3499-505. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3499-3505.2002.
The activity of five simulated antifungal regimens for eradication of catheter-related bloodstream Candida infection was evaluated with an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Single-lumen central venous catheters were colonized with Candida species by sequentially incubating central venous catheters in plasma and then in growth medium (RPMI plus morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) containing a standardized suspension (10(5) CFU/ml) of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, or slime-producing Candida parapsilosis. Colonized central venous catheters were then placed in a one-compartment pharmacodynamic model where five antifungal regimens (plus control) were simulated: amphotericin B, 1.0 mg/kg every 24 h; amphotericin B, 0.5 mg/kg every 24 h; fluconazole, 400 mg every 24 h; fluconazole, 800 mg every 24 h; and voriconazole, 4 mg/kg every 12 h. During exposure to the simulated clinical regimens, samples were serially removed from the model over 48 h for quantitation of viable organisms. All antifungal regimens suppressed fungal counts by both peripheral and catheter sampling versus control (P = 0.001). Overall, antifungal activity ranked amphotericin B (1 mg/kg) > amphotericin B (0.5 mg/kg) > or = voriconazole > fluconazole (800 mg) > or = fluconazole (400 mg). No regimen, however, completely eradicated (by culture and electron microscopy) central venous catheter colonization. Regrowth was noted in the model during therapy against C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis but was not associated with an increase in the MICs for the isolates. Lack of in vitro antifungal activity against biofilm-encased organisms appeared to be the primary reason for mycological failure of antifungal regimens in the model.
采用体外药效学模型评估了五种模拟抗真菌治疗方案根除导管相关血流念珠菌感染的活性。通过将单腔中心静脉导管依次置于血浆中孵育,然后置于含有白色念珠菌、光滑念珠菌或产黏液近平滑念珠菌标准化悬液(10⁵ CFU/ml)的生长培养基(RPMI加吗啉丙磺酸)中,使中心静脉导管被念珠菌属定植。然后将定植的中心静脉导管置于单室药效学模型中,模拟五种抗真菌治疗方案(加对照):两性霉素B,每24小时1.0 mg/kg;两性霉素B,每24小时0.5 mg/kg;氟康唑,每24小时400 mg;氟康唑,每24小时800 mg;伏立康唑,每12小时4 mg/kg。在暴露于模拟临床方案期间,在48小时内从模型中连续取样以定量活菌数。与对照相比,所有抗真菌治疗方案通过外周和导管取样均抑制了真菌计数(P = 0.001)。总体而言,抗真菌活性排序为两性霉素B(1 mg/kg)>两性霉素B(0.5 mg/kg)≥伏立康唑>氟康唑(800 mg)≥氟康唑(400 mg)。然而,没有一种方案能(通过培养和电子显微镜)完全根除中心静脉导管定植。在针对光滑念珠菌和近平滑念珠菌的治疗过程中,模型中出现了再生长,但与分离株的MIC增加无关。对生物膜包裹的生物体缺乏体外抗真菌活性似乎是该模型中抗真菌治疗方案真菌学失败的主要原因。