Cohen D J, Dibble E, Grawe J M, Pollin W
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975 Nov;32(11):1371-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1975.01760290039004.
Blood typing is the most reliable method for assigning zygosity to twinships in psychological research. Cost, ethical considerations, and practical difficulties in obtaining blood specimens from a large group of children suggested the need for a questionnaire method used with young children and completed by parents. One was designed to assess zygosity based on the extent to which the children were rated as looking alike and being confused by family and strangers. Validity was determined with a sample of twins whose zygosity was demonstrated by blood typing. To determine test-retest reliability, and to explore parental beliefs about zygosity, mothers of same-sex twinships completed the questionnaire on two separate occasions, showing very high agreement. The major difference in parental perceptions of monozygotic and dizygotic twinships is convenient for epidemiological research. This difference, however, questions the assumption, made in estimates of heritability using twin data, that both twinships have identical environmental experiences.
在心理学研究中,血型鉴定是确定双胞胎合子性最可靠的方法。由于成本、伦理考量以及从一大群儿童中获取血样的实际困难,因此需要一种由父母完成的针对幼儿的问卷方法。其中一种问卷旨在根据儿童在被家人和陌生人认为长得相像以及容易混淆的程度来评估合子性。通过对一组血型鉴定显示了合子性的双胞胎样本进行研究来确定有效性。为了确定重测信度,并探究父母对合子性的看法,同性双胞胎的母亲在两个不同时间完成了问卷,结果显示一致性非常高。父母对同卵和异卵双胞胎看法的主要差异便于进行流行病学研究。然而,这种差异对使用双胞胎数据估计遗传力时所做的假设提出了质疑,该假设认为两种双胞胎具有相同的环境经历。