• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉丁裔儿童的哮喘管理与减少环境烟草烟雾暴露:一项对照试验。

Asthma management and environmental tobacco smoke exposure reduction in Latino children: a controlled trial.

作者信息

Hovell Melbourne F, Meltzer Susan B, Wahlgren Dennis R, Matt Georg E, Hofstetter C Richard, Jones Jennifer A, Meltzer Eli O, Bernert J Thomas, Pirkle James L

机构信息

Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92123, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):946-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.946.

DOI:10.1542/peds.110.5.946
PMID:12415035
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study tested the efficacy of coaching to reduce environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure among asthmatic Latino children.

DESIGN

After asthma management education, families were randomly assigned to no additional service (control condition) or to coaching for ETS exposure reduction (experimental condition).

SETTING

The study was conducted in San Diego, California.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred four Latino children (ages 3-17 years) with asthma participated.

INTERVENTION

Approximately 1.5 hours of asthma management education was provided; experimental families also obtained 7 coaching sessions ( approximately 45 minutes each) to reduce ETS exposure.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reported ETS exposure and children's urine cotinine were measured.

RESULTS

Parents in the coached condition reported their children exposed to significantly fewer cigarettes than parents of control children by 4 months (postcoaching). Reported prevalence of exposed children decreased to 52% for the coached families, but only to 69% for controls. By month 4, mean cotinine levels decreased among coached and increased among control children. Cotinine prevalence decreased from 54% to 40% among coached families, while it increased from 43% to 49% among controls. However, cotinine levels decreased among controls to the same level achieved by coached families by the 13-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma management education plus coaching can reduce ETS exposure more than expected from education alone, and decreases in the coached condition may be sustained for about a year. The delayed decrease in cotinine among controls is discussed.

摘要

目的

本研究测试了指导干预对于减少患有哮喘的拉丁裔儿童接触环境烟草烟雾(ETS)的效果。

设计

在进行哮喘管理教育后,家庭被随机分配至不接受额外服务(对照条件)或接受减少ETS接触指导(实验条件)。

地点

该研究在加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥进行。

参与者

204名患有哮喘的拉丁裔儿童(年龄3至17岁)参与了研究。

干预措施

提供了约1.5小时的哮喘管理教育;实验组家庭还接受了7次指导课程(每次约45分钟)以减少ETS接触。

观察指标

测量报告的ETS接触情况以及儿童尿液中的可替宁水平。

结果

接受指导的实验组家庭的家长报告,在指导干预4个月后(指导后),他们的孩子接触香烟的数量明显少于对照组家庭的孩子。报告显示,接受指导的家庭中接触香烟的儿童患病率降至52%,而对照组仅降至69%。到第4个月时,接受指导的儿童的可替宁平均水平下降,而对照组儿童的可替宁平均水平上升。接受指导的家庭中可替宁患病率从54%降至40%,而对照组则从43%升至49%。然而,在13个月的随访中,对照组儿童的可替宁水平下降至与接受指导的家庭相同的水平。

结论

哮喘管理教育加指导干预比单纯教育更能减少ETS接触,且接受指导干预组的减少效果可能持续约一年。文中讨论了对照组可替宁水平延迟下降的情况。

相似文献

1
Asthma management and environmental tobacco smoke exposure reduction in Latino children: a controlled trial.拉丁裔儿童的哮喘管理与减少环境烟草烟雾暴露:一项对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):946-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.946.
2
Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.旨在减少儿童接触环境烟草烟雾的家庭及照顾者吸烟控制项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 31;1(1):CD001746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub4.
3
Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.减少儿童接触环境烟草烟雾的家庭及照料者吸烟控制项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 1(3):CD001746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub3.
4
Evaluating environmental tobacco smoke exposure in a group of Turkish primary school students and developing intervention methods for prevention.评估一组土耳其小学生的环境烟草烟雾暴露情况并制定预防干预方法。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Aug 10;7:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-202.
5
A controlled trial of an environmental tobacco smoke reduction intervention in low-income children with asthma.一项针对低收入哮喘儿童的减少环境烟草烟雾干预措施的对照试验。
Chest. 2001 Nov;120(5):1709-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.5.1709.
6
A randomized trial of parental behavioral counseling and cotinine feedback for lowering environmental tobacco smoke exposure in children with asthma: results of the LET'S Manage Asthma trial.一项针对父母行为咨询和可替宁反馈降低哮喘儿童环境烟草烟雾暴露的随机试验:LET'S Manage Asthma 试验结果。
Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):581-590. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0772. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
7
Counseling to reduce children's secondhand smoke exposure and help parents quit smoking: a controlled trial.减少儿童二手烟暴露并帮助父母戒烟的咨询:一项对照试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Dec;11(12):1383-94. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp148. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
8
Providing coaching and cotinine results to preteens to reduce their secondhand smoke exposure: a randomized trial.为青少年提供指导和可替宁检测结果以减少其二手烟暴露:一项随机试验。
Chest. 2011 Sep;140(3):681-689. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2609. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
9
Advising parents of asthmatic children on passive smoking: randomised controlled trial.就被动吸烟问题向哮喘儿童家长提供建议:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 1999 May 29;318(7196):1456-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1456.
10
The effects of low-level environmental tobacco smoke exposure on pulmonary function tests in preschool children with asthma.低水平环境烟草烟雾暴露对学龄前哮喘儿童肺功能测试的影响。
J Asthma. 2014 Sep;51(7):685-90. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.894054. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.针对哮喘儿童的家庭式教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD008469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008469.pub3.
2
Changing Exposure Perceptions: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention with Smoking Parents.改变暴露认知:一项针对吸烟父母的干预措施的随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 12;17(10):3349. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103349.
3
Randomised controlled trial of real-time feedback and brief coaching to reduce indoor smoking.
实时反馈和简短辅导减少室内吸烟的随机对照试验。
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):183-190. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054717. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Moderators of Establishing a Smoke-Free Home: Pooled Data from Three Randomized Controlled Trials of a Brief Intervention.建立无烟家庭的影响因素:简短干预措施的三项随机对照试验的汇总数据。
J Community Health. 2019 Feb;44(1):121-126. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0561-6.
5
Kids Safe and Smokefree (KiSS) Multilevel Intervention to Reduce Child Tobacco Smoke Exposure: Long-Term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.儿童安全与无烟环境(KiSS)多层面干预减少儿童烟草烟雾暴露:一项随机对照试验的长期结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 12;15(6):1239. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061239.
6
Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.旨在减少儿童接触环境烟草烟雾的家庭及照顾者吸烟控制项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 31;1(1):CD001746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub4.
7
Randomized Trial to Reduce Air Particle Levels in Homes of Smokers and Children.随机试验减少吸烟者和儿童家庭空气中的颗粒水平。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Mar;54(3):359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.017. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
8
Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial.动机性访谈和尿可替宁反馈以阻止易患哮喘儿童的被动吸烟暴露:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15158-2.
9
A Minimal Intervention to Promote Smoke-Free Homes among 2-1-1 Callers: North Carolina Randomized Effectiveness Trial.一项针对 211 热线来电者促进无烟家庭的最小干预措施:北卡罗来纳州随机有效性试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 2;11(11):e0165086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165086. eCollection 2016.
10
A Qualitative Study Among Mexican Americans to Understand Factors Influencing the Adoption and Enforcement of Home Smoking Bans.墨西哥裔美国人定性研究,以了解影响家庭禁烟令采用和执行的因素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Nov 7;19(12):1465-1472. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw270.