Suppr超能文献

使用发射α粒子的化合物进行肿瘤的血管靶向内放射治疗:理论分析

Vascular targeted endoradiotherapy of tumors using alpha-particle-emitting compounds: theoretical analysis.

作者信息

Akabani Gamal, McLendon Roger E, Bigner Darrell D, Zalutsky Michael R

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Nov 15;54(4):1259-75. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03794-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To establish the theoretical framework and study the feasibility of (211)At-labeled anti-tenascin chimeric 81C6 monoclonal antibody (mAb) as anti-vascular endoradiotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The morphology of blood vessels from histologic images was analyzed and used along with reaction-diffusion equations to assess the activity concentration of (211)At-labeled chimeric 81C6 mAb in GBM tumor and normal-brain tissue. Alpha particle microdosimetry was then used to assess the survival probability and average absorbed dose for tumor and normal tissue endothelial cells (ECs) per unit vascular cumulated activity concentration q(source) (MBq-s g(-1)). In turn, these survival probabilities were used to assess the probability of failure Phi for a single vessel. Furthermore, using the vessel density, the specific tumor control probability per unit mass of tumor tissue (tcp) and the specific normal-tissue complication probability per unit mass of normal-brain tissue (ntcp) were estimated. The specific tumor control probability, tcp, was used to assess the overall tumor control probability (TCP) as a function of tumor mass.

RESULTS

The levels of (211)At-labeled ch81C6 mAb cumulated activity concentration in GBM tumor tissue were approximately five times higher than that in normal-brain tissue. Thus, the average absorbed dose to tumor ECs was higher than that of normal tissue ECs, and the survival probability for GBM ECs was lower than for normal-brain tissue ECs. Consequently, the resulting vessel-failure probability, Phi, for GBM tumor and for normal-brain tissue differ considerably, yielding a q(source) range between 10(3) and 10(4) MBq-s g(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

This theoretical analysis demonstrated that (211)At-labeled chimeric 81C6 is an effective anti-vascular therapy for the treatment of GBM tumors, yielding a tcp higher than 0.999 for vascular cumulated activity concentrations q(source) higher than 1 x 10(4) MBq-s g(-1), while yielding a low probability for normal-brain tissue damage.

摘要

目的

建立理论框架,研究(211)砹标记的抗腱生蛋白嵌合81C6单克隆抗体(mAb)作为抗血管内放射疗法治疗多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)肿瘤的可行性。

方法和材料

分析组织学图像中血管的形态,并结合反应扩散方程,评估(211)砹标记的嵌合81C6 mAb在GBM肿瘤和正常脑组织中的活性浓度。然后,使用α粒子微剂量测定法评估每单位血管累积活性浓度q(源)(MBq-s g⁻¹)时肿瘤和正常组织内皮细胞(ECs)的存活概率和平均吸收剂量。反过来,这些存活概率用于评估单个血管的失败概率Phi。此外,利用血管密度,估计每单位肿瘤组织质量的特定肿瘤控制概率(tcp)和每单位正常脑组织质量的特定正常组织并发症概率(ntcp)。特定肿瘤控制概率tcp用于评估作为肿瘤质量函数的总体肿瘤控制概率(TCP)。

结果

(211)砹标记的ch81C6 mAb在GBM肿瘤组织中的累积活性浓度水平比正常脑组织中的高约五倍。因此,肿瘤ECs的平均吸收剂量高于正常组织ECs,GBM ECs的存活概率低于正常脑组织ECs。因此,GBM肿瘤和正常脑组织产生的血管失败概率Phi有很大差异,产生的q(源)范围在10³和10⁴ MBq-s g⁻¹之间。

结论

该理论分析表明,(211)砹标记的嵌合81C6是一种有效的抗血管疗法,用于治疗GBM肿瘤,当血管累积活性浓度q(源)高于1×10⁴ MBq-s g⁻¹时,tcp高于0.999,同时对正常脑组织造成损伤的概率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验