• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将优势等级制度的形成建模为多人游戏。

Modelling dominance hierarchy formation as a multi-player game.

作者信息

Broom M, Cannings C

机构信息

Centre for Statistics and Stochastic Modelling, School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Sussex, UK.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2002 Dec 7;219(3):397-413. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3137.

DOI:10.1006/jtbi.2002.3137
PMID:12419665
Abstract

Animals who live in groups need to divide available resources amongst themselves. This is often achieved by means of a dominance hierarchy, where dominant individuals obtain a larger share of the resources than subordinate individuals. This paper introduces a model of dominance hierarchy formation using a multi-player extension of the classical Hawk-Dove game. Animals play non-independent pairwise games in a Swiss tournament which pairs opponents against those which have performed equally well in the conflict so far, for a fixed number of rounds. Resources are divided according to the number of contests won. The model, and its emergent properties, are discussed in the context of experimental observations.

摘要

群居动物需要在彼此之间分配可用资源。这通常通过优势等级制度来实现,即优势个体比从属个体获得更大份额的资源。本文引入了一个优势等级制度形成的模型,该模型使用经典鹰鸽博弈的多人扩展。动物们在瑞士制比赛中进行非独立的两两博弈,在固定轮次内,对手会与在冲突中表现同样出色的对手配对。资源根据赢得的比赛次数进行分配。本文在实验观察的背景下讨论了该模型及其涌现特性。

相似文献

1
Modelling dominance hierarchy formation as a multi-player game.将优势等级制度的形成建模为多人游戏。
J Theor Biol. 2002 Dec 7;219(3):397-413. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3137.
2
Can transitive inference evolve in animals playing the hawk-dove game?传递性推理能在玩鹰鸽博弈的动物中进化吗?
J Theor Biol. 2003 Jun 21;222(4):461-70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00059-6.
3
A Game-Theoretical Winner and Loser Model of Dominance Hierarchy Formation.一种支配等级制度形成的博弈论赢家与输家模型。
Bull Math Biol. 2016 Jun;78(6):1259-90. doi: 10.1007/s11538-016-0186-9. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
4
The coevolution of transitive inference and memory capacity in the hawk-dove game.在鹰鸽博弈中传递性推理和记忆能力的共同进化。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Nov 7;456:91-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
5
A unified model of dominance hierarchy formation and maintenance.支配等级制度形成与维持的统一模型。
J Theor Biol. 2002 Nov 7;219(1):63-72.
6
Hormonal underpinnings of status conflict: Testosterone and cortisol are related to decisions and satisfaction in the hawk-dove game.地位冲突的激素基础:睾酮和皮质醇与鹰鸽博弈中的决策及满意度相关。
Horm Behav. 2017 Jun;92:141-154. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
7
Reputation and the evolution of conflict.声誉与冲突的演变
J Theor Biol. 2003 Feb 7;220(3):345-57. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2003.3166.
8
The effects of dominance on leadership and energetic gain: a dynamic game between pairs of social foragers.优势对领导能力和能量获取的影响:社会觅食者对之间的动态博弈。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002252. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
The asymmetric Hawk-Dove game with costs measured as time lost.带有时间损失成本测度的非对称鹰鸽博弈
J Theor Biol. 2022 Aug 21;547:111162. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111162. Epub 2022 May 14.
10
The Hairy-Downy game: a model of interspecific social dominance mimicry.毛茸拟态游戏:种间社会优势模仿模型。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Nov 21;313:42-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Interaction rates, vital rates, background fitness and replicator dynamics: how to embed evolutionary game structure into realistic population dynamics.相互作用率、生命率、背景适应性与复制者动态:如何将进化博弈结构嵌入现实的种群动态中。
Theory Biosci. 2018 Apr;137(1):33-50. doi: 10.1007/s12064-017-0257-y. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
The Fragility of Individual-Based Explanations of Social Hierarchies: A Test Using Animal Pecking Orders.基于个体的社会等级制度解释的脆弱性:一项使用动物啄序的测试
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0158900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158900. eCollection 2016.
3
Balancing risks and rewards: the logic of violence.
权衡风险与回报:暴力的逻辑
Front Behav Neurosci. 2009 Nov 16;3:51. doi: 10.3389/neuro.08.051.2009. eCollection 2009.