Ravanat Jean-Luc, Douki Thierry, Duez Pierre, Gremaud Eric, Herbert Karl, Hofer Tim, Lasserre Lydie, Saint-Pierre Christine, Favier Alain, Cadet Jean
Laboratoire Lésions des Acides Nucléiques, DRFMC/SCIB UMR 5046 CEA Grenoble, 17 Avenue des Martyrs, F-38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Carcinogenesis. 2002 Nov;23(11):1911-8. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.11.1911.
The measurement of oxidative damage to cellular DNA is a challenging analytical problem requiring highly sensitive and specific methods. In addition, artefactual DNA oxidation during its extraction and subsequent work-up may give rise to overestimated levels of oxidized DNA bases. In the present study, we have used (18)O-labelled 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodGuo) as an internal standard to evaluate the extent of artefactual DNA oxidation during the critical steps preceding the measurement. The labelled oxidized purine nucleoside was specifically generated in cellular DNA using the recently available generator of (18)O-labelled singlet oxygen. Artefactual DNA oxidation that could take place during the work-up increases the level of 8-oxodGuo but not of the (18)O-oxidized nucleoside. Therefore, the ratio between the two compounds, as measured by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, allows an unambiguous comparison of different methodologies. The comparison of different DNA extraction protocols led to the conclusion that artefactual DNA oxidation during the extraction step could be minimized if: (i) nuclei are isolated after cell lysis; (ii) desferrioxamine, a transition metal chelator is added to the different extraction buffers; and (iii) sodium iodide (or alternatively guanidine thiocyanate) is used for DNA precipitation. It was also demonstrated that sodium iodide does not decompose the targeted oxidized purine nucleoside. In addition, three different DNA digestion protocols were evaluated and they were found to give rise to similar results. Using the best-studied protocol, the steady-state cellular background level of 8-oxodGuo, in a lymphocyte cell line, was determined to be approximately 0.5 lesions/10(6) DNA nucleosides.
测量细胞DNA的氧化损伤是一个具有挑战性的分析问题,需要高度灵敏和特异的方法。此外,DNA在提取及后续处理过程中人为造成的氧化可能导致氧化DNA碱基水平被高估。在本研究中,我们使用(18)O标记的8-氧代-7,8-二氢-2'-脱氧鸟苷(8-氧代脱氧鸟苷,8-oxodGuo)作为内标,以评估在测量前的关键步骤中人为造成的DNA氧化程度。使用最近可得的(18)O标记单线态氧发生器在细胞DNA中特异性生成标记的氧化嘌呤核苷。在处理过程中可能发生的人为DNA氧化会增加8-氧代脱氧鸟苷的水平,但不会增加(18)O氧化核苷的水平。因此,通过高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测量的这两种化合物之间的比率,可以对不同方法进行明确比较。对不同DNA提取方案的比较得出结论:如果满足以下条件,提取步骤中人为造成的DNA氧化可以降至最低:(i)细胞裂解后分离细胞核;(ii)向不同提取缓冲液中添加过渡金属螯合剂去铁胺;(iii)使用碘化钠(或硫氰酸胍)进行DNA沉淀。还证明碘化钠不会分解目标氧化嘌呤核苷。此外,评估了三种不同的DNA消化方案,发现它们产生相似的结果。使用研究最充分的方案,测定淋巴细胞系中8-氧代脱氧鸟苷的稳态细胞背景水平约为0.5个损伤/10(6)个DNA核苷。