Suppr超能文献

两种透明质酸药物与安慰剂治疗膝骨关节炎患者的比较。一项对照、随机、双盲、平行设计的多中心研究。

Comparison of two hyaluronan drugs and placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis. A controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design multicentre study.

作者信息

Karlsson J, Sjögren L S, Lohmander L S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Nov;41(11):1240-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.11.1240.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections of two different hyaluronan preparations and placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

In a randomized, patient- and observer-blind, placebo-controlled and multicentre trial with parallel groups, 210 patients, aged 60 yr or above, with knee osteoarthritis were included in a per protocol analysis. The patients were treated with three injections, once weekly, of either native high-molecular-weight hyaluronan (Artzal((R))) or cross-linked hyaluronan (Synvisc((R))) or with placebo and were followed for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy measures were weight-bearing pain during study weeks 0-26 and the duration of clinical benefit measured with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for weeks 0-52. The secondary outcome measures were resting and maximum pain, Lequesne index, WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) and SF-36 (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey) scores.

RESULTS

The intra-articular injections produced a significant reduction in weight-bearing pain, resting pain, maximum pain and Lequesne and WOMAC scores after 26 weeks. There were no significant differences in outcome between any of the three study groups during the first 26 weeks. In direct comparison against placebo for weeks 0-52, neither hyaluronan treatment (Artzal or Synvisc) showed a significantly longer duration of clinical benefit than placebo. However, when data for the two hyaluronan-treated groups were pooled, treatment with hyaluronan had a significantly longer duration of benefit compared with placebo (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Patients with knee osteoarthritis who were treated by injection into the knee of either of two hyaluronan preparations or placebo showed clinical improvement during the first 26 weeks of treatment, though neither hyaluronan preparation gave a longer duration of clinical benefit than placebo. However, when data for the two hyaluronan treatments were pooled, there was a significantly longer duration of clinical benefit for hyaluronan treatment than for placebo.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同透明质酸制剂及安慰剂关节腔内注射治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项随机、患者及观察者双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心平行组试验中,纳入210例60岁及以上的膝骨关节炎患者进行符合方案分析。患者接受每周1次,共3次注射,分别为天然高分子量透明质酸(Artzal((R)))或交联透明质酸(Synvisc((R)))或安慰剂,并随访52周。主要疗效指标为研究第0 - 26周的负重疼痛,以及用Kaplan-Meier生存分析测量的第0 - 52周临床获益持续时间。次要结局指标为静息痛和最大疼痛、Lequesne指数、WOMAC(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数)以及SF-36(医学结局研究简表健康调查)评分。

结果

关节腔内注射在26周后使负重疼痛、静息痛、最大疼痛以及Lequesne和WOMAC评分显著降低。在最初26周内,三个研究组之间的结局无显著差异。在第0 - 52周与安慰剂直接比较时,两种透明质酸治疗(Artzal或Synvisc)均未显示出比安慰剂有显著更长的临床获益持续时间。然而,当将两个透明质酸治疗组的数据合并时,与安慰剂相比,透明质酸治疗的获益持续时间显著更长(P = 0.047)。

结论

接受两种透明质酸制剂之一或安慰剂膝关节注射治疗的膝骨关节炎患者在治疗的前26周均有临床改善,尽管两种透明质酸制剂均未显示出比安慰剂有更长的临床获益持续时间。然而,当将两种透明质酸治疗的数据合并时,透明质酸治疗的临床获益持续时间显著长于安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验