Sprigle Stephen, Wootten Mary, Bresler Mark, Flinn Nanette
Center for Rehabilitation Technology, Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, NY, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Nov;83(11):1597-602. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35468.
To develop a valid noninvasive means to measure pelvic tilt and hip angle in seated posture.
Validation cohort study using radiographs as a criterion standard for pelvic posture.
Rehabilitation hospital.
Volunteer sample of 10 adult men with no known physical disability.
Radiographs were taken as subjects sat in erect, anterior, and posterior postures. An electromagnetic tracking device was as a pointer to digitize the anterior superior and posterior superior iliac spines and as a 6 degrees of freedom (df) sensor mounted on the thigh and sacrum.
Variables included pelvic tilt and hip flexion angle. Intra- and interrater reliability of radiographic measures was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficient comparison of the results from 2 investigators. Validity was determined by comparing noninvasive measures of pelvic and hip angles to radiographic measures by using correlation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and regression.
Reliability of radiographic measures of pelvic tilt and hip angles were >/=.98. Pelvic tilt comparison: pointer: r=.89, R(2)=.80; 6-df sensor: r=.91, R(2)=.83; hip angle comparison using 6-df sensor: r=.78 with average difference of 4.25 degrees. ANOVA showed that differences between all invasive and noninvasive measures did not differ significantly (P>.05).
Results indicated excellent reliability of radiographic analysis techniques and represented an improvement over previously published techniques. Noninvasive measures of pelvic tilt and hip angle were shown to be valid.
开发一种有效的非侵入性方法来测量坐姿时的骨盆倾斜度和髋关节角度。
采用X线片作为骨盆姿势标准的验证队列研究。
康复医院。
10名无已知身体残疾的成年男性志愿者样本。
让受试者分别以直立、前倾和后倾姿势就座时拍摄X线片。使用电磁跟踪设备作为指针来数字化髂前上棘和髂后上棘,并作为安装在大腿和骶骨上的六自由度(df)传感器。
变量包括骨盆倾斜度和髋关节屈曲角度。通过使用组内相关系数比较两名研究者的结果来确定X线片测量的组内和组间可靠性。通过使用相关性、方差分析(ANOVA)和回归,将骨盆和髋关节角度的非侵入性测量结果与X线片测量结果进行比较来确定有效性。
骨盆倾斜度和髋关节角度的X线片测量可靠性> / =.98。骨盆倾斜度比较:指针:r =.89,R(2)=.80;6-df传感器:r =.91,R(2)=.83;使用6-df传感器的髋关节角度比较:r =.78,平均差异为4.25度。方差分析表明,所有侵入性和非侵入性测量之间的差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。
结果表明X线片分析技术具有出色的可靠性,并且比先前发表的技术有所改进。骨盆倾斜度和髋关节角度的非侵入性测量方法被证明是有效的。