Suppr超能文献

[重症治疗中的伦理与法律]

[Ethics and law in intensive therapy].

作者信息

Elö Gábor, Pénzes István

机构信息

Semmelweis Egyetem, Altalános Orvostudományi Kar, Aneszteziológiai és Intenzív Terápiás Klinika, Budapest.

出版信息

Orv Hetil. 2002 Aug 25;143(34):1991-5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intensive therapy is one of the newest areas of medicine. The patient who was thought to be hopeless yesterday is given a chance to survive. As in other fields of medicine parallel with their development, several ethical and legal problems arise and wait for solutions.

AIMS

Two areas need urgent solutions especially at first ethical then at legal levels. These are the questions of life and death: where is the boundary of euthanasia and can the so called DNR ("Do Not Resuscitate") strategy be applied, which partial therapy withdrawal can be done compatibly with the basic ethical and legal requirement of protection of life. Important question as well, is that where lies the boundary of free self determination. How can be living wills be given when is it necessary to ask for the patient's consent, how much information is to be given to the patient.

METHODS

Based on increasing experiences form Europe and the USA, some of the important fundamental principles of therapy withdrawal of intensive care therapy is outlined. Besides the above described questions, a short description of the Hungarian conditions will be given.

RESULTS

Although the number of declarations given by professional corporations increase decisions of the jury help the medical practitioner in making his difficult decisions, but making the individual decision personal communication of the medical staff with the patient or his foster play an important role. Everything is the patient's right of free self determination based on the patient being properly informed. The ethical and even the legal attitude does not consider withdrawal of a widening circle of therapy to a form of euthanasia.

CONCLUSIONS

In the mirror of international experiences concordance is reached in many aspects of therapy withdrawal in intensive care. In the mean time national regulations are not yet available, this is the reason, why based on the international declarations, keeping an eye on the Hungarian practice these regulations should be worked out in the near future.

摘要

引言

强化治疗是医学领域中最新的领域之一。昨天还被认为无药可救的患者如今有了生存的机会。与医学其他领域的发展一样,随之出现了一些伦理和法律问题亟待解决。

目的

有两个领域尤其需要首先从伦理层面、其次从法律层面迫切加以解决。这些问题涉及生死:安乐死的界限在哪里,所谓的“不要复苏”(DNR)策略是否适用,哪些部分治疗的撤除能够在符合保护生命这一基本伦理和法律要求的情况下进行。同样重要的问题是,自由自主决定权的界限在哪里。何时需要征求患者同意才能做出生前预嘱,应该向患者提供多少信息。

方法

基于欧洲和美国不断增加的经验,概述了重症监护治疗撤除的一些重要基本原则。除上述问题外,还将简要描述匈牙利的情况。

结果

尽管专业团体发表的声明数量有所增加,但陪审团的裁决有助于医生做出艰难的决定,不过医护人员与患者或其监护人的个人沟通在做出个人决定时起着重要作用。一切都基于患者得到适当告知后其自由自主决定权。伦理乃至法律态度并不将越来越多治疗的撤除视为安乐死的一种形式。

结论

从国际经验来看,在重症监护治疗撤除的许多方面达成了共识。与此同时,国家法规尚未出台,这就是为什么应基于国际声明,关注匈牙利的做法,在不久的将来制定这些法规的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验