Sanchez-Ramos Luis, Bernstein Sara, Kaunitz Andrew M
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida 32209, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Nov;100(5 Pt 1):997-1002.
To systematically review and summarize the medical literature regarding the effects of expectant management and labor induction on mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes in patients with suspected fetal macrosomia.
We supplemented a search of entries in electronic databases with references cited in original studies and review articles to identify studies assessing management of patients with suspected fetal macrosomia.
We evaluated, abstracted data, and performed quantitative analyses in studies assessing the outcome of patients with suspected fetal macrosomia. Observational studies and randomized trials were included in this systematic review.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were identified, 11 of which met our criteria for systematic review and meta-analysis. These 11 studies included 3751 subjects. Of these, 2700 were managed expectantly, and 1051 underwent labor induction. We calculated an estimate of the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes, using random- and fixed-effects models for outcomes. Summary statistics for the nine observational studies showed that, compared with those whose labor was induced, women who experienced spontaneous onset of labor had a lower incidence of cesarean delivery (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30, 0.50) and higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.34, 3,19); however, significant differences in these outcomes were not noted when the two randomized trials were assessed. No differences were noted in rates of operative vaginal deliveries, incidence of shoulder dystocia, or abnormal Apgar scores in the analyses of the observational or randomized studies.
Based on data from observational studies, labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia results in an increased cesarean delivery rate without improving perinatal outcomes. Although their statistical power is limited, randomized clinical trials have not confirmed these findings.
系统回顾和总结关于期待管理和引产对疑似巨大胎儿患者分娩方式及围产期结局影响的医学文献。
我们在电子数据库检索条目的基础上,补充了原始研究和综述文章中引用的参考文献,以识别评估疑似巨大胎儿患者管理情况的研究。
我们对评估疑似巨大胎儿患者结局的研究进行评估、提取数据并进行定量分析。本系统综述纳入了观察性研究和随机试验。
制表、整合及结果:共识别出29项研究,其中11项符合我们系统综述和荟萃分析的标准。这11项研究包括3751名受试者。其中,2700名接受期待管理,1051名接受引产。我们使用随机效应模型和固定效应模型计算二分结局的比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)估计值。9项观察性研究的汇总统计显示,与引产的女性相比,自然发动分娩的女性剖宫产发生率较低(OR 0.39,95%CI 0.30,0.50),自然阴道分娩率较高(OR 2.07,95%CI 1.34,3.19);然而,在评估两项随机试验时,这些结局未发现显著差异。在观察性研究或随机研究的分析中,阴道助产率、肩难产发生率或阿氏评分异常率均未发现差异。
基于观察性研究数据,对疑似巨大胎儿进行引产会导致剖宫产率增加,且未改善围产期结局。尽管随机临床试验的统计效力有限,但尚未证实这些发现。