• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“这实在是违背常理。”英国公众对转基因食品的认知

"It just goes against the grain." Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK.

作者信息

Shaw Alison

机构信息

Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2002 Jul;11(3):273-91. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/305.

DOI:10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/305
PMID:12430532
Abstract

This paper reports on one aspect of qualitative research on public understandings of food risks, focusing on lay understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK context. A range of theoretical, conceptual, and empirical literature on food, risk, and the public understanding of science are reviewed. The fieldwork methods are outlined and empirical data from a range of lay groups are presented. Major themes include: varying "technical" knowledge of science, the relationship between knowledge and acceptance of genetic modification, the uncertainty of scientific knowledge, genetic modification as inappropriate scientific intervention in "nature", the acceptability of animal and human applications of genetic modification, the appropriate boundaries of scientific innovation, the necessity for GM foods, the uncertainty of risks in GM food, fatalism about avoiding risks, and trust in "experts" to manage potential risks in GM food. Key discussion points relating to a sociological understanding of public attitudes to GM food are raised and some policy implications are highlighted.

摘要

本文报道了关于公众对食品风险认知的定性研究的一个方面,重点关注英国背景下公众对转基因食品的认知。回顾了一系列关于食品、风险以及公众对科学认知的理论、概念和实证文献。概述了实地调查方法,并展示了来自一系列普通群体的实证数据。主要主题包括:对科学的不同“技术”知识、知识与对基因改造的接受程度之间的关系、科学知识的不确定性、基因改造作为对“自然”的不当科学干预、基因改造在动物和人类应用中的可接受性、科学创新的适当界限、转基因食品的必要性、转基因食品风险的不确定性、对规避风险的宿命论以及对“专家”管理转基因食品潜在风险的信任。提出了与从社会学角度理解公众对转基因食品态度相关的关键讨论要点,并强调了一些政策含义。

相似文献

1
"It just goes against the grain." Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK.“这实在是违背常理。”英国公众对转基因食品的认知
Public Underst Sci. 2002 Jul;11(3):273-91. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/305.
2
Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.对生物技术的态度:评估信息更灵通的公众的意见。
New Genet Soc. 2005 Apr;24(1):31-56. doi: 10.1080/14636770500037693.
3
Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?对风险监管的信任:转基因食品可接受性的原因还是结果?
Risk Anal. 2005 Feb;25(1):199-209. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x.
4
[Genetically modified food (food derived from biotechnology): current and future trends in public acceptance and safety assessment].[转基因食品(源自生物技术的食品):公众接受度与安全性评估的现状及未来趋势]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2002 Nov;49(11):1135-41.
5
Knowledge, Attitudes Toward, and Acceptability of Genetic Modification among Western Balkan University Students of Life Sciences (AGREE Study).西巴尔干地区生命科学专业大学生对基因改造的认知、态度及可接受性(AGREE研究)
J Am Coll Nutr. 2016;35(2):150-60; quiz 161-2. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2014.1003115. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
6
Social representations of genetically modified foods and public willingness to consume such foods in Taiwan.台湾地区民众对转基因食品的社会认知与消费意愿。
J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Nov;98(14):5428-5434. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9086. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
7
What consumers don't know about genetically modified food, and how that affects beliefs.消费者对转基因食品所不了解的情况,以及这如何影响他们的看法。
FASEB J. 2016 Sep;30(9):3091-6. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600598. Epub 2016 May 19.
8
The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century: a review.21世纪人类食品基因改造的影响:综述
Biotechnol Adv. 2000 May;18(3):179-206. doi: 10.1016/s0734-9750(00)00033-1.
9
Tony Conner.托尼·康纳
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Mar;26(3):259. doi: 10.1038/nbt0308-259.
10
Increasing public understanding of transgenic crops through the World Wide Web.
Public Underst Sci. 2002 Jul;11(3):293-304. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/306.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Acceptance of Genetic Engineering Among Adults in the UAE: A Cross-Sectional Study.阿联酋成年人对基因工程的认知、态度及接受度:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2025 Jul 20;17(7):e88365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88365. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Health Scares: Tracing Their Nature, Growth and Spread.健康恐慌:追溯其本质、发展与传播。
Clin Psychol Eur. 2023 Dec 22;5(4):e12209. doi: 10.32872/cpe.12209. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Experts' moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study.专家对基因驱动技术的道德观点:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 8;22(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00588-5.
4
Synthetic livestock vaccines as risky interference with nature? Lay and expert arguments and understandings of "naturalness".合成牲畜疫苗是否会对自然造成风险干扰?“自然性”的外行和专家观点与理解。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Apr;29(3):289-305. doi: 10.1177/0963662520906083. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Highly esteemed science: An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers.备受推崇的科学:对两荷兰报纸社论中读者对科学的态度和看法的分析。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):37-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662519878988. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
6
Examining the Gap between Science and Public Opinion about Genetically Modified Food and Global Warming.审视科学与公众对转基因食品和全球变暖的看法之间的差距。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0166140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166140. eCollection 2016.
7
Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists 'open up' appraisal of geoengineering.应对气候变化方案的审议性映射:公民与专家对地球工程的“开放式”评估
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Apr;25(3):269-86. doi: 10.1177/0963662514548628. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
8
Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras.预期治理:人类/动物嵌合体的生物伦理专业知识
Sci Cult (Lond). 2012 Sep;21(3):291-313. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2011.630069. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
9
The risks of eating and drinking.饮食的风险。
EMBO Rep. 2004 Oct;5 Spec No(Suppl 1):S27-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400225.