• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对癌症基因检测相关问题的简要评估:癌症风险评估多维影响(MICRA)问卷

A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

作者信息

Cella David, Hughes Chanita, Peterman Amy, Chang Chih-Hung, Peshkin Beth N, Schwartz Marc D, Wenzel Lari, Lemke Amy, Marcus Alfred C, Lerman Caryn

机构信息

Center on Outcomes Research and Education, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Illinois 60201, USA.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2002 Nov;21(6):564-72.

PMID:12433008
Abstract

The Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) is a new tool to measure the specific impact of result disclosure after genetic testing. The authors compared its performance with that of questionnaires measuring general and cancer-specific distress. Participants (158 women) responded 1 month after they received genetic test results. The women were divided into 4 standard clinical test result groups: BRCA1/2 positive, BRCA1/2 negative, panel negative, and true negative. Factor analysis supported the formation of 3 subscales: Distress (6 items, alpha = .86), Uncertainty (9 items, alpha = .77), and Positive Experiences (4 items, alpha = .75). All 3 MICRA subscales differentiated participants who were BRCA1/2 positive from the other 3 groups. MICRA thus helps identify subgroups of vulnerable genetic testing participants.

摘要

癌症风险评估的多维影响(MICRA)是一种用于衡量基因检测结果披露的具体影响的新工具。作者将其性能与测量一般和癌症特异性困扰的问卷进行了比较。参与者(158名女性)在收到基因检测结果1个月后做出回应。这些女性被分为4个标准临床检测结果组:BRCA1/2阳性、BRCA1/2阴性、基因检测板阴性和真阴性。因子分析支持了3个分量表的形成:困扰(6个项目,α = 0.86)、不确定性(9个项目,α = 0.77)和积极体验(4个项目,α = 0.75)。所有3个MICRA分量表都区分了BRCA1/2阳性的参与者与其他3组。因此,MICRA有助于识别基因检测参与者中的脆弱亚组。

相似文献

1
A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.对癌症基因检测相关问题的简要评估:癌症风险评估多维影响(MICRA)问卷
Health Psychol. 2002 Nov;21(6):564-72.
2
Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer.临床特征会影响无信息价值的DNA检测结果的影响:申请乳腺癌基因检测的女性所经历的担忧和痛苦过程。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 1;24(22):3672-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.7259.
3
Psychological distress and quality of life associated with genetic testing for breast cancer risk.与乳腺癌风险基因检测相关的心理困扰和生活质量
Psychooncology. 2008 Aug;17(8):767-73. doi: 10.1002/pon.1291.
4
Comparison of individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing with regard to coping, illness perceptions, illness experiences, family system characteristics and hereditary cancer distress.选择进行BRCA1/2或遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)基因易感性检测的个体在应对方式、疾病认知、疾病经历、家庭系统特征和遗传性癌症困扰方面的比较。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jan;65(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
5
Coping with genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.应对乳腺癌易感性基因检测
Psychosom Med. 2009 Jan;71(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318190d7b4. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
6
Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk relatives: a cancer risk assessment program's experience.将BRCA1和BRCA2检测结果告知高危亲属:一项癌症风险评估项目的经验
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003 May 15;119C(1):11-8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10003.
7
No evidence of false reassurance among women with an inconclusive BRCA1/2 genetic test result.在BRCA1/2基因检测结果不确定的女性中,没有发现虚假安慰的证据。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Dec;14(12):2862-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0512.
8
Tolerance for uncertainty and perceived risk among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 test results.接受无意义的BRCA1/2检测结果的女性对不确定性和感知风险的耐受性。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2006 Nov 15;142C(4):251-9. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30104.
9
Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study.家庭系统特征与对癌症易感性基因检测的心理调适:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Genet. 2007 Jan;71(1):35-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00731.x.
10
Utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.BRCA1/BRCA2基因突变检测在新诊断乳腺癌患者中的应用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Apr;14(4):1003-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-0545.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the multidimensional impact of cancer risk assessment (MICRA) questionnaire: Japanese version.癌症风险评估多维影响(MICRA)问卷的信效度:日文版
Fam Cancer. 2025 Sep 3;24(3):66. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00496-2.
2
An eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Predisposition in Patients With Metastatic Cancers: Protocol for a Randomized Trial.转移性癌症患者遗传性易感性癌症基因检测的电子健康交付替代方案:一项随机试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 25;14:e72515. doi: 10.2196/72515.
3
TRIAGE-GS: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a genomics-first approach to rare disease diagnosis for patients awaiting assessment by a clinical geneticist.
TRIAGE-GS:针对等待临床遗传学家评估的患者,采用基因组学优先方法进行罕见病诊断的随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e107603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107603.
4
BRCA cascade counselling and testing in Italy: current position and future directions.意大利的BRCA级联咨询与检测:现状与未来方向
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14419-y.
5
A roadmap for genome projects to foster psychosocial and economic evidence to further policy and practice.基因组计划路线图,以促进社会心理和经济证据,推动政策与实践发展。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 27;5(1):198. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00917-4.
6
At-home Breast Oncology care Delivered with EHealth solutions (ABODE) study protocol: a randomised controlled trial.采用电子健康解决方案提供的居家乳腺肿瘤护理(ABODE)研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 8;15(5):e091579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091579.
7
Understanding the reasons for declining to participate in cancer genetics and genomic studies in the USA: a scoping review protocol.了解美国拒绝参与癌症遗传学和基因组学研究的原因:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 30;15(4):e093998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093998.
8
A randomized study of 2 risk assessment models for individualized breast cancer risk estimation.一项关于两种用于个体化乳腺癌风险评估的风险评估模型的随机研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Aug 1;117(8):1593-1604. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf067.
9
How people undergoing genomic sequencing interpret and react to varied secondary findings with limited actionability.进行基因组测序的人如何解读并应对具有有限可操作性的各种次要发现。
Per Med. 2025 Apr;22(2):93-101. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2476392. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
10
Impact of polygeNic risk score for glaucoma on psycHosocial ouTcomes (INSiGHT) study protocol.青光眼多基因风险评分对心理社会结局的影响(INSIGHT)研究方案
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 26;19(12):e0312390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312390. eCollection 2024.