Flanagan Moira B, May James G, Dobie Thomas G
Department of Psychology, College of Sciences, University of New Orleans, Lakefront, LA 70148, USA.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002 Nov;73(11):1067-73.
Two current theories concerning the etiology of motion sickness (MS)-the eye movement hypothesis and sensory conflict theory-were evaluated under conditions that manipulated the degree of optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and/or vection.
Eye movement and perceptual responses were elicited with whole field stimulation in a vertically striped rotating drum and modulated with fixation and/or a restriction of the field of view (FOV). Measures of OKN, vection, and MS were recorded under the various conditions.
Both visual field restriction and/or fixation diminished circular vection, OKN, and MS. Conditions involving both fixation and restricted FOV resulted in greater reductions in MS than did either restriction alone.
These findings lend support to a multi-factor explanation of MS, involving both sensory conflict and eye movement.
在操纵视动性眼震(OKN)程度和/或运动错觉的条件下,对当前关于晕动病(MS)病因的两种理论——眼动假说和感觉冲突理论进行了评估。
在垂直条纹旋转鼓中通过全视野刺激引发眼动和感知反应,并用注视和/或视野(FOV)限制进行调节。在各种条件下记录OKN、运动错觉和MS的测量值。
视野限制和/或注视均减少了圆周运动错觉、OKN和MS。涉及注视和受限FOV的条件比单独任何一种限制导致MS的减少更大。
这些发现支持了对MS的多因素解释,涉及感觉冲突和眼动。