Kupek Emil
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Saúde Pública-CCS, Campus Universitario, Trindade, 88,040-900 Florianópolis-SC, Brazil.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 Nov 18;2:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-14.
Frequent use of self-reports for investigating recent and past behavior in medical research requires statistical techniques capable of analyzing complex sources of bias associated with this methodology. In particular, although decreasing accuracy of recalling more distant past events is commonplace, the bias due to differential in memory errors resulting from it has rarely been modeled statistically.
Covariance structure analysis was used to estimate the recall error of self-reported number of sexual partners for past periods of varying duration and its implication for the bias.
Results indicated increasing levels of inaccuracy for reports about more distant past. Considerable positive bias was found for a small fraction of respondents who reported ten or more partners in the last year, last two years and last five years. This is consistent with the effect of heteroscedastic random error where the majority of partners had been acquired in the more distant past and therefore were recalled less accurately than the partners acquired more recently to the time of interviewing.
Memory errors of this type depend on the salience of the events recalled and are likely to be present in many areas of health research based on self-reported behavior.
在医学研究中,频繁使用自我报告来调查近期和过去的行为,需要能够分析与该方法相关的复杂偏差来源的统计技术。特别是,虽然回忆更久远过去事件的准确性下降是常见现象,但由此产生的记忆错误差异导致的偏差很少进行统计建模。
采用协方差结构分析来估计不同持续时间过去时间段内自我报告的性伴侣数量的回忆误差及其对偏差的影响。
结果表明,关于更久远过去的报告不准确程度在增加。在过去一年、过去两年和过去五年中报告有十个或更多伴侣的一小部分受访者中发现了相当大的正偏差。这与异方差随机误差的影响一致,即大多数伴侣是在更久远的过去获得的,因此与采访时最近获得的伴侣相比,回忆的准确性较低。
这种类型的记忆错误取决于所回忆事件的显著性,并且很可能存在于基于自我报告行为的许多健康研究领域中。