Price Rumi Kato, Risk Nathan K, Wong Mamie Mee, Klingle Renee Storm
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 40 N. Kingshighway, Suite 2, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2002;117 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S39-50.
The authors analyzed four recent large national surveys to assess the degree of use and abuse of a wide range of psychoactive substances across subgroups of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) and in comparison with whites.
The surveys analyzed were the 1999 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, the 1992 National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey, and the 1995 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health In-School and In-Home surveys. The AAPI sample sizes varied from 900 to more than 4,500 across the four surveys.
Among major racial groups, use of major substances is lowest for AAPIs. Among disaggregated AAPI groups, Japanese Americans have the highest substance use rates. Mixed-heritage AAPIs are at high risk for substance use, even after controlling for cultural protective factors and socioeconomic measures. Differential rates correspond to the ranking of several acculturation and socioeconomic indices.
The results, while preliminary, point to the importance of rethinking ethnic and racial classifications for estimating substance use and abuse, for studying substance abuse problems in mixed-heritage adolescents, and for studying socioenvironmental and potentially genetic protective factors.
作者分析了四项近期的全国性大型调查,以评估亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民(AAPI)各亚组中多种精神活性物质的使用和滥用程度,并与白人进行比较。
所分析的调查包括1999年全国药物滥用家庭调查、1992年全国酒精流行病学纵向调查以及1995年青少年健康全国纵向研究在校和在家调查。在这四项调查中,AAPI的样本量从900到4500多人不等。
在主要种族群体中,AAPI对主要物质的使用最少。在细分的AAPI群体中,日裔美国人的物质使用率最高。即使在控制了文化保护因素和社会经济指标之后,具有混合血统的AAPI仍有较高的物质使用风险。不同的比率与几种文化适应和社会经济指标的排名相对应。
这些结果虽然是初步的,但表明在估计物质使用和滥用情况、研究混合血统青少年的物质滥用问题以及研究社会环境和潜在的遗传保护因素时,重新思考种族和族裔分类具有重要意义。