Kombian S B, Hirasawa M, Mouginot D, Pittman Q J
Faculty of Pharmacy, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
Prog Brain Res. 2002;139:235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(02)39020-4.
It is now generally accepted that magnocellular neurons of the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei release the neuropeptides oxytocin and vasopressin from their dendrites. Peptide release from their axon terminals in the posterior pituitary and dendrites differ in dynamics suggesting that they may be independently regulated. The dendritic release of peptide within the supraoptic nucleus (SON) is an important part of its physiological function since the local peptides can regulate the electrical activity of magnocellular neurons (MCNs) which possess receptors for these peptides. This direct postsynaptic action would affect the output of peptide in the neurohypophysis. Another way that these peptides can regulate MCN activity would be to modulate afferent inputs unto themselves. Although the influence of afferent inputs (inhibitory and excitatory) on SON magnocellular neuron physiology has been extensively described in the last decade, a role for these locally released peptides on synaptic physiology of this nucleus has been difficult to show until recently, partly because of the difficulty of performing stable synaptic recordings from these cells in suitable preparations that permit extensive examination. We recently showed that under appropriate conditions, oxytocin acts as a retrograde transmitter in the SON. Oxytocin, released from the dendrites of MCNs, decreased evoked excitatory synaptic transmission by inhibiting glutamate release from the presynaptic terminals. It modulated voltage-dependent calcium channels, mainly N-type and to a lesser extent P/Q-type channels, located on glutamatergic terminals. Although evidence is less conclusive, it is possible that vasopressin has similar actions to reduce excitatory transmission. This synaptic depressant effect of oxytocin and/or vasopressin, released from dendrites, would ensure that MCNs regulate afferent input unto themselves using their own firing rate as a gauge. Alternatively, it may only be a subset of afferent terminals that are sensitive to these peptides, thereby providing a means for the MCNs to selectively filter their afferent inputs. Indeed its specificity is partly proven by our observation that oxytocin does not affect spontaneous glutamate release, or GABA release from inhibitory terminals (Brussaard et al., 1996). Thus, the dendrites of MCNs of the supraoptic nucleus serve a dual role as both recipients of afferent input and regulators of the magnitude of afferent input, allowing them to directly participate in the shaping of their output. This adds to a rapidly growing body of evidence in support of the concept of a two-way communication between presynaptic terminals and postsynaptic dendrites, and shows the potential of this nucleus as a model to study such form of synaptic transmission.
目前普遍认为,视上核和室旁核的大细胞神经元从其树突释放神经肽催产素和血管加压素。它们在后叶垂体轴突终末和树突的肽释放动力学不同,这表明它们可能受到独立调节。视上核(SON)内肽的树突释放是其生理功能的重要组成部分,因为局部肽可以调节拥有这些肽受体的大细胞神经元(MCNs)的电活动。这种直接的突触后作用会影响神经垂体中肽的输出。这些肽调节MCN活性的另一种方式是调节自身的传入输入。尽管在过去十年中已经广泛描述了传入输入(抑制性和兴奋性)对视上核大细胞神经元生理学的影响,但直到最近才难以证明这些局部释放的肽在该核突触生理学中的作用,部分原因是在允许进行广泛检查的合适标本中从这些细胞进行稳定的突触记录存在困难。我们最近表明,在适当条件下,催产素在视上核中作为逆行递质起作用。从MCNs树突释放的催产素通过抑制突触前终末的谷氨酸释放来减少诱发的兴奋性突触传递。它调节位于谷氨酸能终末的电压依赖性钙通道,主要是N型,在较小程度上是P/Q型通道。尽管证据不太确凿,但血管加压素可能具有类似的作用来减少兴奋性传递。从树突释放的催产素和/或血管加压素的这种突触抑制作用将确保MCNs以自身的放电频率为指标来调节自身的传入输入。或者,可能只有一部分传入终末对这些肽敏感,从而为MCNs提供了一种选择性过滤其传入输入的方式。实际上,我们观察到催产素不影响自发性谷氨酸释放或抑制性终末的GABA释放(Brussaard等人,1996),这部分证明了其特异性。因此,视上核MCNs的树突起着双重作用,既是传入输入的接受者,又是传入输入强度的调节者,使它们能够直接参与其输出的塑造。这增加了越来越多的证据,支持突触前终末和突触后树突之间双向通信的概念,并显示了该核作为研究这种突触传递形式的模型的潜力。