Carrozzo M, Stratta F, McIntyre J, Lacquaniti F
Sezione di Fisiologia Umana, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Dec;147(4):426-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1232-4. Epub 2002 Sep 26.
Subjects reached in three-dimensional space to a set of remembered targets whose position was varied randomly from trial to trial, but always fell along a "virtual" line (line condition). Targets were presented briefly, one-by-one and in an empty visual field. After a short delay, subjects were required to point to the remembered target location. Under these conditions, the target was presented in the complete absence of allocentric visual cues as to its position in space. However, because the subjects were informed prior to the experiment that all targets would fall on a straight line, they could conceivably imagine each point target as belonging to a single rigid object with a particular geometry and orientation in space, although this virtual object was never explicitly shown to the subjects. We compared the responses to repeated measurements of each target with those measured for targets presented in a directionally neutral configuration (sphere condition), and used the variable errors to infer the putative reference frames underlying the corresponding sensorimotor transformation. Performance in the different tasks was compared under two different lighting conditions (dim light or total darkness) and two memory delays (0.5 or 5 s). The pattern of variable errors differed significantly between the sphere condition and the line condition. In the former case, the errors were always accounted for by egocentric reference frames. By contrast the errors in the line condition revealed both egocentric and allocentric components, consistent with the hypothesis that target information can be defined concurrently in both egocentric and allocentric frames of reference, resulting in two independent coexisting representations.
受试者在三维空间中伸向一组记忆中的目标,这些目标的位置在每次试验中随机变化,但始终沿着一条“虚拟”线(直线条件)。目标逐一短暂呈现,且在空视野中呈现。短暂延迟后,受试者被要求指向记忆中的目标位置。在这些条件下,目标呈现时完全没有关于其在空间中位置的异我中心视觉线索。然而,由于受试者在实验前被告知所有目标都将落在一条直线上,他们可以想象每个点目标都属于一个在空间中具有特定几何形状和方向的单一刚性物体,尽管这个虚拟物体从未明确展示给受试者。我们将对每个目标的重复测量结果与在方向中性配置(球体条件)下呈现的目标测量结果进行比较,并使用可变误差来推断相应感觉运动转换背后的假定参考框架。在两种不同的光照条件(暗光或完全黑暗)和两种记忆延迟(0.5秒或5秒)下比较了不同任务中的表现。球体条件和直线条件下的可变误差模式有显著差异。在前一种情况下,误差总是由自我中心参考框架解释。相比之下,直线条件下的误差显示出自我中心和异我中心成分,这与目标信息可以在自我中心和异我中心参考框架中同时定义的假设一致,从而导致两种独立共存的表征。