Suppr超能文献

患者对糖尿病护理质量的评估(PEQD):一种新工具的开发与验证

Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD): development and validation of a new instrument.

作者信息

Pouwer F, Snoek F J

机构信息

Diabetes Research Group, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO-Institute), Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):131-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.131.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a brief measure of patients' evaluation of the quality of diabetes care and to study predictors of consumers' rating of the quality of diabetes care.

DESIGN

A prospective design.

SUBJECTS

176 adults with type 1 (39%) or type 2 (61%) diabetes.

MAIN MEASURES

Demographic variables, HbA1c, number of diabetes complications, satisfaction with diabetes care, diabetes related distress, and fear of hypoglycaemia were assessed by self-report. In addition, satisfaction with diabetes care and evaluations about quality of the care were measured at 16 month follow up. Statistical analysis comprised principal component analyses, Cronbach's alpha, t tests, Pearson's correlation, and linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

Results in the literature were used to develop the 14 items of the Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD) scale, assessing the most important aspects of the quality of diabetes care as delivered by the specialist in internal medicine (internist) and the diabetes nurse specialist (DNS). Two principal components analyses (internist/DNS) both yielded one 14 item factor with a high internal consistency. Satisfaction with diabetes care, fewer diabetes related complications, fewer treatment related problems, and a low level of worries about hypoglycaemia were predictors of a more positive evaluation of diabetes care delivered by the internist. Sociodemographic variables were not related to the patients' evaluations of the quality of diabetes care.

CONCLUSIONS

The PEQD comprises different aspects of quality of diabetes care and can be regarded as a suitable instrument for evaluating patients' judgements about the quality of their care.

摘要

目的

开发一种用于评估糖尿病护理质量的简短量表,并研究消费者对糖尿病护理质量评分的预测因素。

设计

前瞻性设计。

研究对象

176名1型糖尿病患者(39%)和2型糖尿病患者(61%)。

主要测量指标

通过自我报告评估人口统计学变量、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、糖尿病并发症数量、对糖尿病护理的满意度、糖尿病相关困扰以及对低血糖的恐惧。此外,在16个月的随访中测量对糖尿病护理的满意度和对护理质量的评价。统计分析包括主成分分析、克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)、t检验、皮尔逊相关性分析和线性回归分析。

结果

利用文献中的结果开发了糖尿病护理质量患者评估(PEQD)量表的14个条目,评估内科医生和糖尿病专科护士提供的糖尿病护理质量的最重要方面。两项主成分分析(内科医生/糖尿病专科护士)均产生了一个包含14个条目的因子,具有较高的内部一致性。对糖尿病护理的满意度更高、糖尿病相关并发症更少、治疗相关问题更少以及对低血糖的担忧程度较低,是对内科医生提供的糖尿病护理评价更积极的预测因素。社会人口统计学变量与患者对糖尿病护理质量的评价无关。

结论

PEQD涵盖了糖尿病护理质量的不同方面,可被视为评估患者对其护理质量判断的合适工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Omissions impact measurements of patient-reported outcomes.遗漏会影响患者报告结局的测量。
Qual Life Res. 2008 Aug;17(6):963-4; author reply 965-6. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9347-0. Epub 2008 May 6.

本文引用的文献

10
Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?患者满意度:一个有效的概念?
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):509-16. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验