• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD): development and validation of a new instrument.患者对糖尿病护理质量的评估（PEQD）：一种新工具的开发与验证
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):131-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.131.
2
QUOTE-HIV: an instrument for assessing quality of HIV care from the patients' perspective.QUOTE-HIV：一种从患者角度评估艾滋病护理质量的工具。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):188-93. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.188.
3
Validation of a diabetes-specific quality-of-life scale for patients with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病患者专用生活质量量表的验证
Diabetes Care. 1998 May;21(5):757-69. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.5.757.
4
Diabetes care: Comparison of patients' and healthcare professionals' assessment using the PACIC instrument.糖尿病护理：使用患者激活护理指数（PACIC）工具对患者与医疗保健专业人员评估的比较
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):803-811. doi: 10.1111/jep.12720. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
5
The Consumer Quality Index Hip Knee Questionnaire measuring patients' experiences with quality of care after a total hip or knee arthroplasty.消费者质量指数髋关节膝关节问卷用于衡量全髋关节或膝关节置换术后患者对护理质量的体验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 26;7:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-60.
6
Development of a New Measure for Assessing Glucose Monitoring Device-Related Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life.一种用于评估血糖监测设备相关治疗满意度和生活质量的新测量方法的开发。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):657-63. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0417. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
7
The consumer quality index anthroposophic healthcare: a construction and validation study.消费者质量指数：人智学医疗保健——一项构建与验证研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 2;14:148. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-148.
8
Patients' perceptions of palliative care: adaptation of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective instrument for use in palliative care, and description of patients' perceptions of care received.患者对姑息治疗的看法：从患者角度改编用于姑息治疗的质量评估工具，并描述患者对所接受护理的看法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Nov 2;14:54. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0049-4.
9
Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire.修订版脊柱侧弯研究学会22项问卷荷兰语改编版的信度和效度
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
10
Audit diabetes-dependent quality of life questionnaire: usefulness in diabetes self-management education in the Slovak population.糖尿病相关生活质量调查问卷的审核：对斯洛伐克人群糖尿病自我管理教育的效用
J Clin Nurs. 2009 May;18(9):1276-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02602.x. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-centered care model based on self-efficacy to improve self-care and quality of life of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A PLS-SEM approach.基于自我效能的以患者为中心的护理模式改善2型糖尿病患者的自我护理和生活质量：一种偏最小二乘结构方程模型方法
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Oct 14;10(5):509-522. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3173. eCollection 2024.
2
Use of Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Pediatric Care: A Systematic Review.患者报告体验测量在儿科护理中的应用：一项系统评价。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 20;9:753536. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.753536. eCollection 2021.
3
Patients' Perception of Quality of Diabetes Care Received in Ibadan, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊巴丹患者对所接受糖尿病护理质量的认知
Arch Basic Appl Med. 2018 Feb;6(1):119-125.
4
The Hoorn Diabetes Care System (DCS) cohort. A prospective cohort of persons with type 2 diabetes treated in primary care in the Netherlands.霍伦糖尿病护理系统（DCS）队列。这是一个在荷兰接受初级护理的2型糖尿病患者的前瞻性队列。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e015599. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015599.
5
The development and validation of the Satisfaction Questionnaire for Osteoporosis Prevention in Malaysia.马来西亚骨质疏松症预防满意度调查问卷的编制与验证
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Sep 30;8:1365-81. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S65718. eCollection 2014.
6
The Sugarsquare study: protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial concerning a web-based patient portal for parents of a child with type 1 diabetes.Sugarsquare 研究：一项多中心随机对照试验的方案，涉及一个基于网络的 1 型糖尿病患儿家长患者门户。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jan 28;14:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-24.
7
The effect of a patient-oriented treatment decision aid for risk factor management in patients with diabetes (PORTDA-diab): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.以患者为中心的糖尿病危险因素管理治疗决策辅助工具（PORTDA-diab）的效果：一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Nov 21;13:219. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-219.
8
Monitoring and discussing health-related quality of life in adolescents with type 1 diabetes improve psychosocial well-being: a randomized controlled trial.监测并讨论1型糖尿病青少年的健康相关生活质量可改善心理社会幸福感：一项随机对照试验
Diabetes Care. 2008 Aug;31(8):1521-6. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0394. Epub 2008 May 28.
9
Omissions impact measurements of patient-reported outcomes.遗漏会影响患者报告结局的测量。
Qual Life Res. 2008 Aug;17(6):963-4; author reply 965-6. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9347-0. Epub 2008 May 6.
10
The effectiveness of adding cognitive behavioural therapy aimed at changing lifestyle to managed diabetes care for patients with type 2 diabetes: design of a randomised controlled trial.将旨在改变生活方式的认知行为疗法添加到2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病管理护理中的效果：一项随机对照试验的设计
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 8;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-74.

本文引用的文献

1
Monitoring of psychological well-being in outpatients with diabetes: effects on mood, HbA(1c), and the patient's evaluation of the quality of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial.糖尿病门诊患者心理健康监测：对情绪、糖化血红蛋白（HbA₁c）及患者对糖尿病护理质量评价的影响：一项随机对照试验
Diabetes Care. 2001 Nov;24(11):1929-35. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1929.
2
Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale.荷兰和美国糖尿病患者中与糖尿病相关的情绪困扰：糖尿病问题领域量表的跨文化效度
Diabetes Care. 2000 Sep;23(9):1305-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1305.
3
The well-being questionnaire: evidence for a three-factor structure with 12 items (W-BQ12).幸福感问卷：一个包含12个条目的三因素结构（W-BQ12）的证据。
Psychol Med. 2000 Mar;30(2):455-62. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700001719.
4
The 12-item well-being questionnaire. An evaluation of its validity and reliability in Dutch people with diabetes.12项幸福感问卷：对其在荷兰糖尿病患者中的有效性和可靠性的评估。
Diabetes Care. 1999 Dec;22(12):2004-10. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.12.2004.
5
A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ).幸福问卷（WBQ）和糖尿病治疗满意度问卷（DTSQ）的标准版本与计算机化版本的比较。
Qual Life Res. 1998 Jan;7(1):33-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1008832821181.
6
Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives.医疗保健质量。纳入消费者视角。
JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1608-12.
7
Does the health status of chronically ill patients predict their judgements of the quality of general practice care?慢性病患者的健康状况能否预测他们对全科医疗服务质量的判断？
Qual Life Res. 1997 May;6(4):293-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1018405207552.
8
The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility.糖尿病问题领域量表。对其临床效用的评估。
Diabetes Care. 1997 May;20(5):760-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.5.760.
9
Differences in preferences between diabetic patients and diabetologists regarding quality of care: a matter of continuity and efficiency of care?糖尿病患者与糖尿病专科医生在医疗质量偏好上的差异：护理的连续性和效率问题？
Diabet Med. 1995 Sep;12(9):828-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb02087.x.
10
Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?患者满意度：一个有效的概念？
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):509-16. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x.

患者对糖尿病护理质量的评估（PEQD）：一种新工具的开发与验证

Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD): development and validation of a new instrument.

作者信息

Pouwer F, Snoek F J

机构信息

Diabetes Research Group, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO-Institute), Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):131-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.131.

DOI:10.1136/qhc.11.2.131
PMID:12448804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1743604/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a brief measure of patients' evaluation of the quality of diabetes care and to study predictors of consumers' rating of the quality of diabetes care.

DESIGN

A prospective design.

SUBJECTS

176 adults with type 1 (39%) or type 2 (61%) diabetes.

MAIN MEASURES

Demographic variables, HbA1c, number of diabetes complications, satisfaction with diabetes care, diabetes related distress, and fear of hypoglycaemia were assessed by self-report. In addition, satisfaction with diabetes care and evaluations about quality of the care were measured at 16 month follow up. Statistical analysis comprised principal component analyses, Cronbach's alpha, t tests, Pearson's correlation, and linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

Results in the literature were used to develop the 14 items of the Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD) scale, assessing the most important aspects of the quality of diabetes care as delivered by the specialist in internal medicine (internist) and the diabetes nurse specialist (DNS). Two principal components analyses (internist/DNS) both yielded one 14 item factor with a high internal consistency. Satisfaction with diabetes care, fewer diabetes related complications, fewer treatment related problems, and a low level of worries about hypoglycaemia were predictors of a more positive evaluation of diabetes care delivered by the internist. Sociodemographic variables were not related to the patients' evaluations of the quality of diabetes care.

CONCLUSIONS

The PEQD comprises different aspects of quality of diabetes care and can be regarded as a suitable instrument for evaluating patients' judgements about the quality of their care.

摘要

目的

开发一种用于评估糖尿病护理质量的简短量表，并研究消费者对糖尿病护理质量评分的预测因素。

设计

前瞻性设计。

研究对象

176名1型糖尿病患者（39%）和2型糖尿病患者（61%）。

主要测量指标

通过自我报告评估人口统计学变量、糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）、糖尿病并发症数量、对糖尿病护理的满意度、糖尿病相关困扰以及对低血糖的恐惧。此外，在16个月的随访中测量对糖尿病护理的满意度和对护理质量的评价。统计分析包括主成分分析、克朗巴哈系数（Cronbach's alpha）、t检验、皮尔逊相关性分析和线性回归分析。

结果

利用文献中的结果开发了糖尿病护理质量患者评估（PEQD）量表的14个条目，评估内科医生和糖尿病专科护士提供的糖尿病护理质量的最重要方面。两项主成分分析（内科医生/糖尿病专科护士）均产生了一个包含14个条目的因子，具有较高的内部一致性。对糖尿病护理的满意度更高、糖尿病相关并发症更少、治疗相关问题更少以及对低血糖的担忧程度较低，是对内科医生提供的糖尿病护理评价更积极的预测因素。社会人口统计学变量与患者对糖尿病护理质量的评价无关。

结论

PEQD涵盖了糖尿病护理质量的不同方面，可被视为评估患者对其护理质量判断的合适工具。