Sougioultzis Stavros, Lee Cynthia K, Alsahli Mazen, Banerjee Subhas, Cadoz Michel, Schrader Robert, Guy Bruno, Bedford Philip, Monath Thomas P, Kelly Ciaran P, Michetti Pierre
Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Vaccine. 2002 Dec 13;21(3-4):194-201. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00467-x.
Low dose E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT), delivered orally or enterically, has been used as an adjuvant for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) urease in healthy adults. In this study we aim to test the safety and adjuvant efficacy of LT delivered rectally together with recombinant H. pylori urease. Eighteen healthy adults without present or past H. pylori infection were enrolled in a double blind, randomized, ascending dose study to receive either urease (60 mg), or urease (60 mg) + LT (5 or 25 microg). The immunization preparation was administered per rectum on days 0, 14 and 28. Serum, stool and saliva anti-urease and anti-LT IgG and IgA antibodies (Abs) were measured and urease-specific and LT-specific antigen secreting cells (ASCs) were counted in peripheral blood at baseline and 7 (ASC counts) or 14 days (antibody levels) after each dosing. Peripheral blood lymphoproliferation assays were also performed at baseline and at the end of the study. Rectally delivered urease and LT were well tolerated. Among the 12 subjects assigned to urease+LT, 2 (16.7%) developed anti-urease IgG Abs, 1 (8.3%) developed anti-urease IgA Abs, and 3 (25%) showed urease-specific IgA(+) ASCs. Immune responses to LT were more vigorous, especially in subjects exposed to 5 microg LT. In the urease+ 5 microg LT group, anti-LT IgG and IgA Abs developed in 60 and 80% of the subjects, respectively, while LT-specific IgG(+) and IgA(+) ASCs were detected in all subjects. The magnitude of the anti-LT response was much higher than the response to urease. No IgA anti-urease or anti-LT Abs were detected in stool or saliva and lymphocyte proliferative responses to urease were unsatisfactory. In conclusion, rectal delivery of 5 microg LT is safe and induces vigorous systemic anti-LT immune responses. Further studies are needed to determine if LT can be an effective adjuvant for rectally delivered antigens.
低剂量的大肠杆菌不耐热肠毒素(LT),通过口服或肠道给药,已被用作健康成年人幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)脲酶的佐剂。在本研究中,我们旨在测试直肠给药的LT与重组幽门螺杆菌脲酶联合使用的安全性和佐剂效果。18名无现患或既往幽门螺杆菌感染的健康成年人参与了一项双盲、随机、剂量递增研究,接受脲酶(60毫克)或脲酶(60毫克)+LT(5或25微克)。免疫制剂在第0、14和28天经直肠给药。在基线以及每次给药后7天(ASC计数)或14天(抗体水平),检测血清、粪便和唾液中的抗脲酶和抗LT IgG及IgA抗体(Abs)并计数外周血中脲酶特异性和LT特异性抗原分泌细胞(ASCs)。在基线和研究结束时也进行外周血淋巴细胞增殖试验。经直肠给药的脲酶和LT耐受性良好。在分配接受脲酶+LT的12名受试者中,2名(16.7%)产生了抗脲酶IgG Abs,1名(8.3%)产生了抗脲酶IgA Abs,3名(25%)出现了脲酶特异性IgA(+) ASCs。对LT的免疫反应更强烈,尤其是在接触5微克LT的受试者中。在脲酶+5微克LT组中,分别有60%和80%的受试者产生了抗LT IgG和IgA Abs,而在所有受试者中均检测到LT特异性IgG(+)和IgA(+) ASCs。抗LT反应的强度远高于对脲酶的反应。在粪便或唾液中未检测到IgA抗脲酶或抗LT Abs,对脲酶淋巴细胞增殖反应不理想。总之,直肠给药5微克LT是安全的,并能诱导强烈的全身抗LT免疫反应。需要进一步研究以确定LT是否可作为经直肠给药抗原的有效佐剂。