Ahmed Tanvir, Bhuiyan Taufiqur R, Zaman K, Sinclair David, Qadri Firdausi
Variation Biotechnologies Inc., Ottawa, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 5;2013(7):CD009029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009029.pub2.
Infection with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) bacteria is a common cause of diarrhoea in adults and children in developing countries and is a major cause of 'travellers' diarrhoea' in people visiting or returning from endemic regions. A killed whole cell vaccine (Dukoral®), primarily designed and licensed to prevent cholera, has been recommended by some groups to prevent travellers' diarrhoea in people visiting endemic regions. This vaccine contains a recombinant B subunit of the cholera toxin that is antigenically similar to the heat labile toxin of ETEC. This review aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this vaccine and other vaccines designed specifically to protect people against diarrhoea caused by ETEC infection.
To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of vaccines for preventing ETEC diarrhoea.
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and http://clinicaltrials.gov up to December 2012.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing use of vaccines to prevent ETEC with use of no intervention, a control vaccine (either an inert vaccine or a vaccine normally given to prevent an unrelated infection), an alternative ETEC vaccine, or a different dose or schedule of the same ETEC vaccine in healthy adults and children living in endemic regions, intending to travel to endemic regions, or volunteering to receive an artificial challenge of ETEC bacteria.
Two authors independently assessed each trial for eligibility and risk of bias. Two independent reviewers extracted data from the included studies and analyzed the data using Review Manager (RevMan) software. We reported outcomes as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
Twenty-four RCTs, including 53,247 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Four studies assessed the protective efficacy of oral cholera vaccines when used to prevent diarrhoea due to ETEC and seven studies assessed the protective efficacy of ETEC-specific vaccines. Of these 11 studies, seven studies presented efficacy data from field trials and four studies presented efficacy data from artificial challenge studies. An additional 13 trials contributed safety and immunological data only. Cholera vaccinesThe currently available, oral cholera killed whole cell vaccine (Dukoral®) was evaluated for protection of people against 'travellers' diarrhoea' in a single RCT in people arriving in Mexico from the USA. We did not identify any statistically significant effects on ETEC diarrhoea or all-cause diarrhoea (one trial, 502 participants, low quality evidence).Two earlier trials, one undertaken in an endemic population in Bangladesh and one undertaken in people travelling from Finland to Morocco, evaluated a precursor of this vaccine containing purified cholera toxin B subunit rather than the recombinant subunit in Dukoral®. Short term protective efficacy against ETEC diarrhoea was demonstrated, lasting for around three months (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.71; two trials, 50,227 participants). This vaccine is no longer available. ETEC vaccinesAn ETEC-specific, killed whole cell vaccine, which also contains the recombinant cholera toxin B-subunit, was evaluated in people travelling from the USA to Mexico or Guatemala, and from Austria to Latin America, Africa, or Asia. We did not identify any statistically significant differences in ETEC-specific diarrhoea or all-cause diarrhoea (two trials, 799 participants), and the vaccine was associated with increased vomiting (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.45; nine trials, 1528 participants). The other ETEC-specific vaccines in development have not yet demonstrated clinically important benefits.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence from RCTs to support the use of the oral cholera vaccine Dukoral® for protecting travellers against ETEC diarrhoea. Further research is needed to develop safe and effective vaccines to provide both short and long-term protection against ETEC diarrhoea.
产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)感染是发展中国家成人和儿童腹泻的常见病因,也是前往流行地区或从流行地区返回的人群中“旅行者腹泻”的主要病因。一种主要设计用于预防霍乱并已获许可的全细胞灭活疫苗(Dukoral®),已被一些组织推荐用于预防前往流行地区的人群发生旅行者腹泻。该疫苗含有霍乱毒素的重组B亚基,其抗原性与ETEC的不耐热毒素相似。本综述旨在评估该疫苗以及其他专门设计用于保护人们免受ETEC感染所致腹泻的疫苗的临床疗效。
评估预防ETEC腹泻疫苗的疗效、安全性和免疫原性。
我们检索了Cochrane传染病小组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS以及截至2012年12月的http://clinicaltrials.gov。
随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验,比较使用疫苗预防ETEC与不进行干预、使用对照疫苗(惰性疫苗或通常用于预防无关感染的疫苗)、替代ETEC疫苗,或相同ETEC疫苗不同剂量或接种程序,研究对象为生活在流行地区、打算前往流行地区或自愿接受ETEC细菌人工激发的健康成人和儿童。
两位作者独立评估每项试验的纳入资格和偏倚风险。两位独立的审阅者从纳入研究中提取数据,并使用Review Manager(RevMan)软件进行数据分析。我们将结果报告为风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。
24项RCT符合纳入标准,共纳入53247名参与者。4项研究评估了口服霍乱疫苗用于预防ETEC所致腹泻的保护效果,7项研究评估了ETEC特异性疫苗的保护效果。在这11项研究中,7项研究提供了现场试验的疗效数据,4项研究提供了人工激发研究的疗效数据。另外13项试验仅提供了安全性和免疫学数据。霍乱疫苗:在一项针对从美国抵达墨西哥的人群的RCT中,评估了目前可用的口服霍乱全细胞灭活疫苗(Dukoral®)预防“旅行者腹泻”的效果。我们未发现对ETEC腹泻或全因腹泻有任何统计学上的显著影响(一项试验,502名参与者,低质量证据)。两项早期试验,一项在孟加拉国的流行人群中进行,另一项在从芬兰前往摩洛哥的人群中进行,评估了该疫苗的前身,其含有纯化的霍乱毒素B亚基而非Dukoral®中的重组亚基。显示出对ETEC腹泻的短期保护效果,持续约三个月(RR 0.43,95%CI 0.26至0.71;两项试验,50227名参与者)。该疫苗现已不再可用。ETEC疫苗:一种ETEC特异性全细胞灭活疫苗,也含有重组霍乱毒素B亚基,在从美国前往墨西哥或危地马拉以及从奥地利前往拉丁美洲、非洲或亚洲的人群中进行了评估。我们未发现ETEC特异性腹泻或全因腹泻有任何统计学上的显著差异(两项试验,799名参与者),且该疫苗与呕吐增加相关(RR 2.0,95%CI 1.16至3.45;九项试验,1528名参与者)。正在研发的其他ETEC特异性疫苗尚未显示出具有临床重要意义 的益处。
目前RCT证据不足,无法支持使用口服霍乱疫苗Dukoral®保护旅行者免受ETEC腹泻。需要进一步研究开发安全有效的疫苗,以提供针对ETEC腹泻的短期和长期保护。