Yáñez Anahí, Rodrigo Gustavo J
Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica, Hospital Aeronáutico Central, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Nov;89(5):479-84. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62085-6.
We performed a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials to determine whether intranasal corticosteroids offered an advantage over topical antihistamines in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
We searched for studies using MEDLINE, Embase, Cinahi, and Cochrane databases, pharmaceutical companies, and references of included trials.
Criteria for considering trials included: 1) published randomized controlled trials; 2) single- or double-blind studies; and 3) presence of one of the following clinical outcomes: nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, global symptoms evaluation of quality of life and side effects.
Nine studies including 648 subjects (mean age 30.4 years, range 13 to 73) with allergic rhinitis were selected. Intranasal corticosteroids produced significantly greater reduction of total nasal symptoms (standardized mean difference -0.36, 95% confidence interval -0.57 to -0.14), sneezing (-0.41, -0.57 to -0.24), rhinorrhea (-0.47, -0.64 to -0.29), itching (-0.38, -0.56 to -0.19), and nasal blockage (-0.86, -1.07 to -0.64) than did topical antihistamines. There was no significant difference between treatments for ocular symptoms (-0.07, -0.27 to 0.12). The effects on sneezing, rhinorrhea, itching, and ocular symptoms were significantly heterogeneous between studies. Other outcomes (total nasal symptom score and nasal blockage) were homogeneous between studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis suggested that most of the heterogeneity of outcomes could be explained on the basis of the methodologic quality of studies.
Intranasal corticosteroids produced greater relief of nasal symptoms than did topical antihistamines (topical H1 receptor antagonists). However, there was no difference in the relief of the ocular symptoms.
我们对随机对照试验进行了系统评价,以确定在治疗过敏性鼻炎方面,鼻用皮质类固醇是否比局部用抗组胺药更具优势。
我们通过医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、护理学与健康领域数据库(Cinahi)、考克兰图书馆数据库、制药公司以及纳入试验的参考文献来检索研究。
纳入试验的标准包括:1)已发表的随机对照试验;2)单盲或双盲研究;3)存在以下临床结局之一:鼻部症状、眼部症状、生活质量的整体症状评估及副作用。
共选取了9项研究,涉及648例过敏性鼻炎患者(平均年龄30.4岁,年龄范围13至73岁)。与局部用抗组胺药相比,鼻用皮质类固醇能更显著地减轻总鼻部症状(标准化均数差值为-0.36,95%置信区间为-0.57至-0.14)、打喷嚏(-0.41,-0.57至-0.24)、流涕(-0.47,-0.64至-0.29)、瘙痒(-0.38,-0.56至-0.19)及鼻塞(-0.86,-1.07至-0.64)。两种治疗方法在缓解眼部症状方面无显著差异(-0.07,-0.27至0.12)。各研究中,打喷嚏、流涕、瘙痒及眼部症状的疗效存在显著异质性。其他结局(总鼻部症状评分及鼻塞)在各研究间具有同质性。亚组分析和敏感性分析表明,大部分结局的异质性可根据研究的方法学质量来解释。
与局部用抗组胺药(局部H1受体拮抗剂)相比,鼻用皮质类固醇能更有效地缓解鼻部症状。然而,在缓解眼部症状方面两者并无差异。