Suppr超能文献

用于过敏性鼻炎的白三烯受体拮抗剂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Leukotriene receptor antagonists for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wilson Andrew M, O'Byrne Paul M, Parameswaran Krishnan

机构信息

Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare, and Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2004 Mar 1;116(5):338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.10.030.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical efficacy of leukotriene receptor antagonists with that of placebo, antihistamines, and nasal corticosteroids in patients with allergic rhinitis or nasal polyposis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists in patients with rhinitis. Composite daily rhinitis symptom scores (as a percentage of the maximum score) and rhinitis-specific quality of life (unit scores ranging from 0 to 6) were pooled after assessing heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimates were expressed as weighted mean differences between treatments in a random-effects model. We considered a difference of 10% in nasal score and 0.6 units in quality-of-life score to be clinically relevant.

RESULTS

Of the 196 citations, 11 studies on seasonal allergic rhinitis were used in the analysis: eight evaluating leukotriene receptor antagonists alone or in combination with other treatments versus placebo or other treatments (n = 3924) and three evaluating leukotriene receptor antagonists plus an antihistamine (n = 80). Leukotriene receptor antagonists reduced mean daily rhinitis symptom scores (in absolute terms) 5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3% to 7%) more than did placebo. However, antihistamines improved the nasal symptoms score 2% (95% CI: 0% to 4%) more than did leukotriene receptor antagonists, and nasal corticosteroids improved the score 12% (95% CI: 5% to 18%) more than did leukotriene antagonists. Leukotriene receptor antagonists significantly improved rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life by 0.3 units (95% CI: 0.24 to 0.36 units) when compared with placebo. There were no randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of leukotriene receptor antagonists on perennial allergic rhinitis or polyposis.

CONCLUSION

Leukotriene receptor antagonists are modestly better than placebo, as effective as antihistamines, but less effective than nasal corticosteroids in improving symptoms and quality of life in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

摘要

目的

比较白三烯受体拮抗剂与安慰剂、抗组胺药及鼻用糖皮质激素治疗变应性鼻炎或鼻息肉患者的临床疗效。

方法

我们对关于白三烯受体拮抗剂治疗鼻炎有效性的随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。在评估各研究间的异质性后,汇总每日鼻炎综合症状评分(以最高评分的百分比表示)和鼻炎特异性生活质量(单位评分范围为0至6)。汇总估计值以随机效应模型中各治疗组间的加权平均差表示。我们认为鼻部分数相差10%以及生活质量分数相差0.6个单位具有临床相关性。

结果

在196篇文献中,11项关于季节性变应性鼻炎的研究纳入分析:8项评估白三烯受体拮抗剂单独使用或与其他治疗联合使用对比安慰剂或其他治疗(n = 3924),3项评估白三烯受体拮抗剂加抗组胺药(n = 80)。白三烯受体拮抗剂使每日鼻炎平均症状评分(绝对值)比安慰剂降低5%(95%置信区间[CI]:3%至7%)。然而,抗组胺药使鼻症状评分比白三烯受体拮抗剂改善2%(95%CI:0%至4%),鼻用糖皮质激素使评分比白三烯受体拮抗剂改善12%(95%CI:5%至18%)。与安慰剂相比,白三烯受体拮抗剂使鼻结膜炎生活质量显著改善0.3个单位(95%CI:0.24至0.3个单位)。没有随机对照试验评估白三烯受体拮抗剂对常年性变应性鼻炎或鼻息肉的作用。

结论

在改善季节性变应性鼻炎患者的症状和生活质量方面,白三烯受体拮抗剂略优于安慰剂,与抗组胺药效果相当,但不如鼻用糖皮质激素有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验