Posner Michael I, Rothbart Mary K, Vizueta Nathalie, Levy Kenneth N, Evans David E, Thomas Kathleen M, Clarkin John F
Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16366-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252644699. Epub 2002 Nov 27.
We consider whether disruption of a specific neural circuit related to self-regulation is an underlying biological deficit in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Because patients with BPD exhibit a poor ability to regulate negative affect, we hypothesized that brain mechanisms thought to be involved in such self-regulation would function abnormally even in situations that seem remote from the symptoms exhibited by these patients. To test this idea, we compared the efficiency of attentional networks in BPD patients with controls who were matched to the patients in having very low self-reported effortful control and very high negative emotionality and controls who were average in these two temperamental dimensions. We found that the patients exhibited significantly greater difficulty in their ability to resolve conflict among stimulus dimensions in a purely cognitive task than did average controls but displayed no deficit in overall reaction time, errors, or other attentional networks. The temperamentally matched group did not differ significantly from either group. A significant correlation was found between measures of the ability to control conflict in the reaction-time task and self-reported effortful control.
我们探讨与自我调节相关的特定神经回路的破坏是否是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)潜在的生物学缺陷。由于BPD患者调节负面情绪的能力较差,我们推测,即使在与这些患者所表现出的症状看似无关的情况下,被认为参与这种自我调节的脑机制也会出现异常运作。为了验证这一想法,我们将BPD患者的注意力网络效率与两组对照者进行了比较,一组对照者自我报告的努力控制水平极低且负面情绪极高,与患者相匹配;另一组对照者在这两个气质维度上处于平均水平。我们发现,在一项纯粹的认知任务中,与平均水平的对照者相比,患者在解决刺激维度之间的冲突能力上表现出显著更大的困难,但在总体反应时间、错误或其他注意力网络方面没有缺陷。气质匹配组与其他两组相比没有显著差异。在反应时间任务中控制冲突的能力测量与自我报告的努力控制之间发现了显著相关性。