Sewell A M, Warburton D W, Boville A, Daley E F, Mullen K
Microbiology Evaluation Division, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Banting Research Centre, Ross Avenue, Address Locator 2204A1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0L2.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Mar 15;81(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00221-0.
Conventional isolation methods, including the Health Products and Food Branch (HPFB), Health Canada method used for the isolation and identification of Listeria species and Listeria monocytogenes from foods and environmental samples, can take a week or more to complete and are usually labor-intensive. This has led to the development of various rapid methods which attempt to generate results comparable to standard methods but in a reduced time-frame with less hands-on operation. Our previous work with rapid detection systems indicated that the recommended enrichment protocols failed to grow the Listeria to detectable levels in a reliable and consistent manner. In the present study, a novel enrichment protocol is described and consists of samples being pre-enriched in Palcam broth (incubated at 35 degrees C for 26 h), enriched in UVM 2 (30 degrees C for 26 h) and then plated and analysed by a rapid detection kit, with results being generated after 52 h of incubation. In total, 200 naturally contaminated samples were analysed by both the HPFB standard method and the Palcam method. The results showed that the Palcam method is comparable to the HPFB method. Further analysis involved a rapid detection system, which applies ELISA techniques and automation in an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA) system. This system, referred to as the Vitek Immuno Diagnostic Assay System or VIDAS, can identify Listeria to the genus or species (L. monocytogenes) level. In this comparison, an additional 324 naturally contaminated samples were analysed by both the Palcam and ELFA methods. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELFA method were 98.1% and 97.0%, respectively, while the efficiency was 97.5%. False-negative and false-positive rates were 1.9% and 3.0%, respectively. These results show that the ELFA method (when using the Palcam method for pre- and secondary enrichment) was efficient and gave reliable results after 52 h of incubation, and met Health Canada's criteria for approval as a rapid method.
