Suppr超能文献

准分子原位角膜磨镶术、眼镜及隐形眼镜用于轻至中度近视的社会经济因素

Socioeconomic aspects of laser in situ keratomileusis, eyeglasses, and contact lenses in mild to moderate myopia.

作者信息

Berdeaux G, Alió Jorge L, Martinez J-M, Magaz S, Badia X

机构信息

Alcon France, Rueil-Malmaison, France.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Nov;28(11):1914-23. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01496-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the societal costs and consequences of 3 strategies to correct mild to moderate myopia: laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), eyeglasses, and contact lenses (CLs).

SETTING

Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

METHODS

A Markov model was set up to compare the present value of LASIK, eyeglasses, and CLs. A structured questionnaire was administered to 40 consecutive patients with mild to moderate myopia to collect resource information including direct medical and nonmedical costs as well as indirect costs (transportation, time spent, hotel, eyeglasses, CLs, LASIK, cleaning products, visits to ophthalmologist/optometrist/optical center, and adverse events linked to LASIK and CLs). The time period ranged from 10 to 30 years with a 5% discount rate. The Spanish population was used as the basis for the economic data. Full sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Based on the time period, LASIK saved from 18 to 278 km in distance to care centers compared with eyeglasses and from 405 to 1436 km compared with CLs. The time to care for visual acuity was similar between LASIK and CLs, but up to 1180 additional hours were spent by CL users. Laser in situ keratomileusis saved from 4.69 to 12.07 eyeglasses and from 28 to 84 eyeglass cleaning packs. With LASIK, there were 18 to 50 visits to the optical center compared with 41 to 117 visits with CLs. Laser in situ keratomileusis saved 4.7 to 12.2 visits to correct visual acuity compared with eyeglasses and CLs. It prevented 95 to 295 per 10 000 cases of CL-related keratitis. Contact lenses were always more costly than LASIK, which was always more costly than eyeglasses. The 2 sensitivity parameters were time period and discount rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser in situ keratomileusis was less costly than CLs and more expensive than eyeglasses, although the potential nonmonetary benefit of LASIK over eyeglasses was not taken into account.

摘要

目的

比较三种矫正轻至中度近视策略的社会成本及后果:准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)、眼镜和隐形眼镜(CL)。

地点

西班牙阿利坎特市阿利坎特眼科研究所。

方法

建立马尔可夫模型以比较LASIK、眼镜和CL的现值。对40例连续的轻至中度近视患者进行结构化问卷调查,收集资源信息,包括直接医疗和非医疗成本以及间接成本(交通、花费时间、酒店、眼镜、CL、LASIK、清洁产品、看眼科医生/验光师/光学中心的次数,以及与LASIK和CL相关的不良事件)。时间范围为10至30年,贴现率为5%。以西班牙人口作为经济数据的基础。进行了全面的敏感性分析。

结果

基于时间段,与眼镜相比,LASIK到医疗中心的距离节省了18至278公里,与CL相比节省了405至1436公里。LASIK和CL在视力护理时间上相似,但CL使用者额外花费了多达1180小时。LASIK节省了4.69至12.07副眼镜以及28至84包眼镜清洁用品。与CL的41至117次相比,LASIK到光学中心的次数为18至50次。与眼镜和CL相比,LASIK在视力矫正方面节省了4.7至12.2次就诊。它每10000例中预防了95至295例与CL相关的角膜炎。隐形眼镜总是比LASIK成本更高,而LASIK总是比眼镜成本更高。两个敏感性参数是时间段和贴现率。

结论

准分子原位角膜磨镶术的成本低于隐形眼镜且高于眼镜,尽管未考虑LASIK相对于眼镜的潜在非货币效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验