Bache John, Brown Jeremy, Graham David
Mersey Deanery, Hamilton House, 24 Pall Mall, Liverpool L3 6AL, UK.
J R Soc Med. 2002 Dec;95(12):612-3. doi: 10.1177/014107680209501210.
Annual review of specialist registrars and production of a record of in-training assessment (RITA) is a mandatory component of training that has attracted criticism. Mersey Deanery has established a system of review that includes wider evaluation of the trainee's needs and of training requirements. We conducted a survey to ascertain whether this broadened review process was thought beneficial. In one year 1093 questionnaires were distributed to trainees and trainers. 605 (81%) of 744 trainees and 309 (89%) of 349 trainers responded. At least 89% of both groups said that the procedure had been effective in reviewing the previous year and the most recent post and in identifying training requirements. More than 90% rated the overall process positively. Trainees particularly appreciated the advice on future training, on careers and on research. This form of review is expensive in consultant time but was valued by both trainees and trainers.
对专科住院医师进行年度评审并生成培训期间评估记录(RITA)是培训的一个强制性组成部分,但这一做法受到了批评。默西地区培训中心已建立了一个评审系统,该系统包括对学员需求和培训要求进行更广泛的评估。我们进行了一项调查,以确定这种更广泛的评审过程是否被认为有益。在一年的时间里,向学员和培训师发放了1093份问卷。744名学员中有605名(81%)回复,349名培训师中有309名(89%)回复。两组中至少89%的人表示,该程序在评审上一年度和最近的岗位情况以及确定培训要求方面是有效的。超过90%的人对整个过程给予了积极评价。学员们特别赞赏关于未来培训、职业发展和研究方面的建议。这种评审形式在顾问时间方面成本高昂,但受到了学员和培训师双方的重视。