McConnell Scott R
Center for Early Education and Development, Department of Educational Psychology, 215 Pattee Hall, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Oct;32(5):351-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1020537805154.
The purpose of this paper is to review the knowledge available from aggregated research (primarily through 2000) on the characteristics of social interactions and social relationships among young children with autism, with special attention to strategies and tactics that promote competence or improved performance in this area. In its commissioning letter for the initial version of this paper, the Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism of the National Research Council requested "a critical, scholarly review of the empirical research on interventions to facilitate the social interactions of children with autism, considering adult-child interactions (where information is available) as well as child-child interactions, and including treatment of [one specific question]: What is the empirical evidence that social irregularities of children with autism are amenable to remediation?" To do this, the paper (a) reviews the extent and quality of empirical literature on social interaction for young children with autism; (b) reviews existing descriptive and experimental research that may inform us of relations between autism and characteristics that support social development, and efforts to promote improved social outcomes (including claims for effectiveness for several specific types of intervention); (c) highlights some possible directions for future research; and (d) summarizes recommendations for educational practices that can be drawn from this research.
本文旨在回顾(主要截至2000年)综合研究中有关自闭症幼儿社交互动及社会关系特征的现有知识,特别关注促进该领域能力或改善表现的策略与方法。在为本文初稿撰写的委托信中,美国国家研究委员会自闭症儿童教育干预委员会要求“对促进自闭症儿童社交互动干预措施的实证研究进行批判性学术综述,考虑成人与儿童的互动(如有相关信息)以及儿童与儿童的互动,并包括对[一个特定问题]的探讨:有哪些实证证据表明自闭症儿童的社交异常情况可得到改善?”为此,本文(a)回顾了关于自闭症幼儿社交互动实证文献的范围和质量;(b)回顾了现有的描述性和实验性研究,这些研究可能会让我们了解自闭症与支持社会发展的特征之间的关系,以及为促进改善社会结果所做的努力(包括对几种特定干预类型有效性的主张);(c)突出了未来研究的一些可能方向;(d)总结了可从该研究中得出的教育实践建议。