Graham John S, Schomacker Kevin T, Glatter Robert D, Briscoe Crystal M, Braue Ernest H, Squibb Katherine S
Comparative Pathology Branch, Comparative Medicine Division, US Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, MD 21010, USA.
Burns. 2002 Dec;28(8):719-30. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(02)00198-5.
The consequences of receiving a cutaneous sulfur mustard (SM) burn are prolonged wound healing and secondary infection. This study was undertaken to find a treatment that promotes quick healing with few complications and minimal disfigurement. Multiple deep SM burns (4 cm diameter) were generated on the ventrum of weanling pigs and treated at 48 h. Four treatments were compared: (1) full-thickness CO(2) laser debridement followed by skin grafting; (2) full-thickness sharp surgical tangential excision followed by skin grafting, the "Gold Standard" used in deep thermal burns management; (3) partial-thickness laser ablation with no grafting; and (4) partial-thickness sharp excision with no grafting. A computer controlled, raster scanned, high-powered continuous wave (cw) CO(2) laser was utilized. Ulceration, wound geometry, and wound contraction were evaluated during a 36-day healing period. Histopathological evaluations were conducted at the end of the healing period. Engraftment rates were similar between both methods of debridement. Laser debridement followed by skin grafting was as efficacious in improving the wound healing of deep SM burns as the "Gold Standard." Full-thickness laser debridement of these small total body surface area (TBSA) burns was time efficient and provided adequate beds for split-thickness skin grafting. Laser debridement offered additional benefits that included hemostatic control during surgery and minimal debridement of normal perilesional skin. Mid-dermal debridement by sharp excision or laser ablation without grafting produced less desirable results but was better than no treatment.
皮肤接触硫芥(SM)烧伤的后果是伤口愈合时间延长和继发感染。本研究旨在寻找一种能促进快速愈合、并发症少且瘢痕形成最小的治疗方法。在断奶仔猪的腹部制造多个深度为SM的烧伤创面(直径4厘米),并在48小时后进行治疗。比较了四种治疗方法:(1)全层二氧化碳激光清创后植皮;(2)全层锐性手术切痂后植皮,这是深度热烧伤治疗中使用的“金标准”;(3)非植皮的部分厚度激光消融;(4)非植皮的部分厚度锐性切除。使用了一台计算机控制、光栅扫描、高功率连续波(cw)二氧化碳激光。在36天的愈合期内评估溃疡、伤口形态和伤口收缩情况。在愈合期结束时进行组织病理学评估。两种清创方法的植皮率相似。二氧化碳激光清创后植皮在改善深度SM烧伤伤口愈合方面与“金标准”同样有效。对这些小面积总体表面积(TBSA)烧伤进行全层激光清创效率高,为中厚皮片移植提供了合适的创面。激光清创还有其他好处,包括手术中的止血控制以及对周围正常皮肤的清创最少。通过锐性切除或激光消融进行的中真皮层清创且不植皮产生的效果较差,但比不治疗要好。