Nakano Shinichi, Iseda Tsutomu, Yoneyama Takumi, Kawano Hirokazu, Wakisaka Shinichiro
Department of Neurosurgery, Miyazaki Medical College, Junwakai Memorial Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Stroke. 2002 Dec;33(12):2872-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000038985.26269.f2.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for patients with acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) trunk occlusion.
Over the past 9 years, a total of 70 patients with acute MCA trunk occlusion were treated with intra-arterial reperfusion therapy. In the last 5 years, 34 patients were treated with direct PTA, and subsequent thrombolytic therapy was added if necessary for distal embolization. The other 36 patients, mainly in the first 4 years, were treated with thrombolytic therapy alone and were used as controls. Pretherapeutic neurological status was evaluated with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to assess clinical outcome at 90 days.
There were no significant differences in pretherapeutic National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and duration of ischemia between the 2 groups. The rate of partial or complete recanalization in the PTA group was 91.2%, whereas that in the thrombolysis-alone group was 63.9% (P<0.01). The incidence of large parenchymal hematoma with neurological deterioration in the PTA group was 2.9%, while that in the thrombolysis-alone group was 19.4% (P=0.03). Although direct PTA did not improve the rate of favorable outcome (mRS score 0 or 1; 41.7% for the thrombolysis-alone group versus 52.9% for the PTA group; P=0.48), outcome in terms of independence (mRS score 0, 1, 2) was significantly better in the PTA group (73.5%) than in the thrombolysis-alone group (50.0%; P=0.04).
Although definitive conclusions on the comparative merits of these 2 therapies cannot be drawn because of an open trial, direct PTA may be an effective alternative option to intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute MCA trunk occlusion.
本研究旨在评估直接经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)治疗急性大脑中动脉(MCA)主干闭塞患者的安全性和有效性。
在过去9年中,共有70例急性MCA主干闭塞患者接受了动脉内再灌注治疗。在过去5年中,34例患者接受了直接PTA治疗,必要时加用后续溶栓治疗以处理远端栓塞。另外36例患者主要在最初4年接受单纯溶栓治疗,并作为对照。治疗前神经功能状态采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分进行评估。改良Rankin量表(mRS)用于评估90天时的临床结局。
两组治疗前美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分及缺血持续时间无显著差异。PTA组部分或完全再通率为91.2%,而单纯溶栓组为63.9%(P<0.01)。PTA组发生伴有神经功能恶化的大面积实质内血肿的发生率为2.9%,而单纯溶栓组为19.4%(P=0.03)。虽然直接PTA未提高良好结局率(mRS评分0或1;单纯溶栓组为41.7%,PTA组为52.9%;P=0.48),但PTA组在独立状态方面(mRS评分0、1、2)的结局显著优于单纯溶栓组(50.0%;P=0.04)。
尽管由于本研究为开放性试验,无法就这两种治疗方法的相对优点得出明确结论,但对于急性MCA主干闭塞,直接PTA可能是动脉内溶栓的一种有效替代选择。