Suppr超能文献

施用技术和泥浆共发酵对施肥后氨、一氧化二氮和甲烷排放的影响:I. 氨挥发

Application technique and slurry co-fermentation effects on ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane emissions after spreading: I. Ammonia volatilization.

作者信息

Wulf S, Maeting M, Clemens J

机构信息

Institute of Plant Nutrition, University of Bonn, Karlrobert-Kreiten-Str. 13, 53115 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2002 Nov-Dec;31(6):1789-94. doi: 10.2134/jeq2002.1789.

Abstract

Ammonia emissions after spreading animal manure contribute a major share to N losses from agriculture. There is an increasing interest in anaerobic co-digestion of liquid manure with organic additives. This fermentation results in a change of physical and chemical parameters of the slurry. Among these are an increased pH and ammonium content, implying a higher risk of NH3 losses from fermentation products. To compare different application techniques and the effect of fermentation on NH3 volatilization, we used the standard comparison method and tested it for reliability. This method seems to be perfectly suited for experiments with a large number of treatments and replicates if prerequisites concerning the experimental layout are considered. We tested four different application techniques on arable and grassland sites. The more the substrate was incorporated into the soil or applied near the soil surface on the grassland site, the less NH3 was lost. Injection of the substrate reduced losses to less than 10% of applied NH4+ on both sites, whereas losses after splash plate application amounted to more than 30%. Trail shoe application on grassland performed as well as injection. Harrowing on arable land also reduced emissions efficiently, if harrowing occurred within the first 2 h after application. Emissions from trail hose-applied co-fermentation product were not greater than from unfermented slurry. Better infiltration of the less viscous substrate seemed to have compensated for the increased loss potential.

摘要

施用动物粪便后的氨排放是农业氮素损失的主要来源。人们对液体粪便与有机添加剂的厌氧共消化越来越感兴趣。这种发酵会导致泥浆的物理和化学参数发生变化。其中包括pH值和铵含量的增加,这意味着发酵产物中氨损失的风险更高。为了比较不同的施用技术以及发酵对氨挥发的影响,我们使用了标准比较方法并测试了其可靠性。如果考虑到实验布局的前提条件,这种方法似乎非常适合进行大量处理和重复的实验。我们在耕地和草地进行了四种不同施用技术的测试。在草地上,底物与土壤混合得越多或施用于土壤表层附近,氨的损失就越少。在两个试验地点,将底物注入土壤可使损失减少到施用铵离子量的10%以下,而通过溅洒板施用后的损失则超过30%。在草地上采用拖板施肥的效果与注入法相同。如果在施用后2小时内进行耙地,在耕地上耙地也能有效减少排放。通过拖管施用共发酵产物的排放量并不比未发酵的泥浆大。粘性较小的底物更好的渗入似乎弥补了增加的损失可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验