Kirby Douglas
ETR Associates, P.O. Box 1830, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
J Sex Res. 2002 Feb;39(1):27-33. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552116.
Because most youth are enrolled in school for many years before they initiate sex and when they initiate sex, schools have the potential for reducing adolescent sexual risk-taking. This paper reviews studies which examine the impact upon sexual risk-taking of school involvement, school characteristics, specific programs in school that do not address sexual behavior, and specific programs that do address sexual risk-taking. Multiple studies support several conclusions. First, involvement in and attachment to school and plans to attend higher education are all related to less sexual risk-taking and lower pregnancy rates. Second, students in schools with manifestations of poverty and disorganization are more likely to become pregnant. Third, some school programs specifically designed to increase attachment to school or reduce school dropout effectively delayed sex or reduced pregnancy rate, even when they did not address sexuality. Fourth, sex and HIV education programs do not increase sexual behavior, and some programs decrease sexual activity and increase condom or contraceptive use. Fifth, school-based clinics and school condom-availability programs do not increase sexual activity, and either may or may not increase condom or contraceptive use. Other studies reveal that there is very broad support for comprehensive sex- and HIV-education programs, and accordingly, most youth receive some amount of sex or HIV education. However, important topics are not covered in many schools.
由于大多数青少年在开始性行为之前已入学多年,且当他们开始性行为时,学校有能力降低青少年的性冒险行为。本文回顾了一些研究,这些研究考察了学校参与度、学校特征、学校中不涉及性行为的特定项目以及涉及性冒险行为的特定项目对性冒险行为的影响。多项研究支持了几个结论。首先,参与学校活动、对学校的归属感以及接受高等教育的计划都与较少的性冒险行为和较低的怀孕率相关。其次,在有贫困和无序表现的学校就读的学生更有可能怀孕。第三,一些专门设计用于增强对学校的归属感或减少辍学率的学校项目有效地推迟了性行为或降低了怀孕率,即使这些项目没有涉及性方面的内容。第四,性教育和艾滋病教育项目不会增加性行为,一些项目还会减少性活动并增加避孕套或避孕药具的使用。第五,校内诊所和学校提供避孕套的项目不会增加性活动,而且可能会也可能不会增加避孕套或避孕药具的使用。其他研究表明,综合性教育和艾滋病教育项目得到了广泛支持,因此,大多数青少年都接受了一定程度的性教育或艾滋病教育。然而,许多学校并未涵盖重要的主题。