Epstein Nancy
The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Surg Neurol. 2002 Sep-Oct;58(3-4):194-207; discussion 207-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(02)00819-4.
If the cervical lordotic curvature has been well preserved, spondylostenosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, with or without instability, may be approached posteriorly in selected older patients (over 65 years of age). Posterior surgical alternatives include the laminectomy with or without fusion, or laminoplasty. However, in younger patients or in geriatric patients with predominantly anterior disease with kyphosis, direct anterior surgical procedures yield better results.
Laminectomy with medial facetectomy and foraminotomy is classically performed in cases in which stability is preserved. However, posterior stabilization using either facet wiring or lateral mass fusion may be warranted. Although some consider the "open door" laminoplasty a reasonable alternative for dorsal decompression, limitations include restricted access to the hinged side, a potential for "closing of the door," and it does not offer a "real" fusion.
Postoperative neurologic improvement may approximate an 85% incidence of good to excellent results. However, where a posterior decompression has been chosen, particularly in younger individuals with or without a lordotic curvature, or in older patients with kyphosis, they will fail to significantly improve, and will be susceptible to early neurologic deterioration.
Posterior approaches to cervical disease may be successful in geriatric individuals in whom the cervical lordotic curvature has been well preserved. However, it is inappropriate for either older or younger patients with predominantly anterior disease, for whom direct anterior decompression with or without posterior stabilization is indicated. In those patients with significant ventral ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), direct anterior resection will result in improved neurologic outcomes, whereas posterior decompression will fail to achieve a similar degree of neurologic recovery. Furthermore, dorsal decompression of OPLL may promote a more rapid progression of OPLL growth and concomitant neurologic deterioration.
如果颈椎前凸曲度保存良好,对于部分老年患者(65岁以上),无论有无不稳定情况,伴有或不伴有后纵韧带骨化的脊椎狭窄症都可采用后路手术。后路手术方式包括有或无融合的椎板切除术,或椎板成形术。然而,对于年轻患者或以前方病变为主且伴有后凸畸形的老年患者,直接前路手术效果更佳。
在稳定性良好的情况下,经典的手术方式是行椎板切除术并联合内侧小关节切除术及椎间孔切开术。然而,可能需要采用小关节钢丝固定或侧块融合进行后路稳定。尽管一些人认为“开门”式椎板成形术是一种合理的后路减压替代方法,但它存在一些局限性,包括对铰链侧的显露受限、有“关门”的可能性,且不提供“真正的”融合。
术后神经功能改善情况良好至优秀的发生率约为85%。然而,如果选择后路减压,特别是对于有或无颈椎前凸曲度的年轻个体,或有后凸畸形的老年患者,减压效果将无法显著改善,且易出现早期神经功能恶化。
后路手术治疗颈椎病对于颈椎前凸曲度保存良好的老年患者可能成功。然而,对于以前方病变为主的老年或年轻患者而言并不合适,这类患者应行直接前路减压,可伴有或不伴有后路稳定。对于那些后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)严重的患者,直接前路切除可改善神经功能,而后路减压则无法达到类似程度的神经功能恢复。此外,OPLL的后路减压可能会促进OPLL生长的更快进展并伴有神经功能恶化。