Monteiro M L R, Medeiros F A, Ostroscki M R
Department of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;87(1):32-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.1.32.
To measure axonal loss in patients with band atrophy from optic chiasm compression using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx, Laser Diagnostic Technologies, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) and to evaluate the ability of this instrument to identify this pattern of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) loss.
19 eyes from 17 consecutive patients with band atrophy of the optic nerve and permanent temporal hemianopia due to chiasmal compression, and 19 eyes from an age and sex matched control group of 17 healthy individuals were prospectively studied. All patients were submitted to an ophthalmic examination including Goldmann perimetry and evaluation of the RNFL using scanning laser polarimetry. Mean RNFL thickness around the optic disc were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic performance of the deviation from normal analysis provided by the GDx software was also assessed.
The peripapillary RNFL thickness (mean (SD)) of eyes with band atrophy was 47.9 (7.63) micro m, 37.1 (8.48) micro m, 57.0 (9.31) micro m, and 37.2 (8.86) micro m in the superior, temporal, inferior, and nasal regions, respectively. The total average was 43.7 (12.0) micro m. In the control group, the corresponding values were 71.1 (12.2) micro m, 40.4 (10.9) micro m, 85.4 (14.0) micro m, and 49.8 (10.1) micro m. The total average measured 67.9 (11.2) micro m. The measurements from eyes with optic atrophy were significantly different from those in the control group in all regions but the temporal. The deviation from normal analysis provided by the GDx software failed to identify the majority of abnormalities in the temporal and nasal regions of patients with band atrophy.
Scanning laser polarimetry was able to identify axonal loss in the superior, inferior, and nasal regions, but failed to detect it in the temporal region of the optic disc, despite the fact that this area was clearly altered in eyes with band atrophy. This examination also showed poor sensitivity to detect axonal loss in the nasal region when GDx software analysis was used. The results of this study emphasise that RNFL evaluation using scanning laser polarimetry should be interpreted with caution in the study of eye diseases that lead to axonal loss predominantly in the nasal and temporal areas of the optic disc.
使用扫描激光偏振仪(GDx,美国加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥市激光诊断技术公司)测量视交叉受压导致带状萎缩患者的轴突损失,并评估该仪器识别这种视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)损失模式的能力。
前瞻性研究了17例因视交叉受压导致视神经带状萎缩和永久性颞侧偏盲患者的19只眼,以及年龄和性别匹配的17名健康个体组成的对照组的19只眼。所有患者均接受眼科检查,包括Goldmann视野检查和使用扫描激光偏振仪评估RNFL。比较两组视盘周围RNFL的平均厚度。还评估了GDx软件提供的偏离正常分析的诊断性能。
带状萎缩眼的视乳头周围RNFL厚度(平均值(标准差))在上方、颞侧、下方和鼻侧区域分别为47.9(7.63)μm、37.1(8.48)μm、57.0(9.31)μm和37.2(8.86)μm。总平均值为43.7(12.0)μm。在对照组中,相应的值分别为71.1(12.2)μm、40.4(10.9)μm、85.4(14.0)μm和49.8(10.1)μm。总平均值为67.9(11.2)μm。除颞侧外,视神经萎缩眼在所有区域的测量值与对照组均有显著差异。GDx软件提供的偏离正常分析未能识别带状萎缩患者颞侧和鼻侧区域的大多数异常情况。
扫描激光偏振仪能够识别上方、下方和鼻侧区域中的轴突损失,但未能检测到视盘颞侧区域的轴突损失,尽管该区域在带状萎缩眼中明显改变。当使用GDx软件分析时,该检查对检测鼻侧区域的轴突损失也显示出较低的敏感性。本研究结果强调,在研究主要导致视盘鼻侧和颞侧区域轴突损失的眼部疾病时,使用扫描激光偏振仪评估RNFL应谨慎解释。