Kolvenbag G J C M, Furr B J A, Blackledge G R P
Medical Affairs, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 1998 Dec;1(6):307-314. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500262.
The non-steroidal antiandrogens flutamide (Eulexin((R))), nilutamide (Anandron((R))) and bicalutamide (Casodex((R))) are widely used in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, particularly in combination with castration. The naturally occurring ligand 5alpha-DHT has higher binding affinity at the androgen receptor than the non-steroidal antiandrogens. Bicalutamide has an affinity two to four times higher than 2-hydroxyflutamide, the active metabolite of flutamide, and around two times higher than nilutamide for wild-type rat and human prostate androgen receptors. Animal studies have indicated that bicalutamide also exhibits greater potency in reducing seminal vesicle and ventral prostate weights and inhibiting prostate tumour growth than flutamide. Although preclinical data can give an indication of the likely clinical activity, clinical studies are required to determine effective, well-tolerated dosing regimens. As components of combined androgen blockade (CAB), controlled studies have shown survival benefits of flutamide plus a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) over LHRH-A alone, and for nilutamide plus orchiectomy over orchiectomy alone. Other studies have failed to show such survival benefits, including those comparing flutamide plus orchiectomy with orchiectomy alone, and nilutamide plus LHRH-A with LHRH-A alone. In a direct comparative study, bicalutamide (50 mg, once daily) was compared with flutamide (250 mg, three times daily), each in combination with an LHRH-A. Both therapies were well tolerated, although more patients could not tolerate flutamide therapy: 25 flutamide plus LHRH-A and 2 bicalutamide plus LHRH-A patients withdrew from therapy due to diarrhoea. There were no statistically significant differences for time to progression or survival between the two antiandrogens. This clinical trial of bicalutamide confirms the prediction from preclinical studies that a 50 mg dose of bicalutamide would be appropriate for use in patients with advanced prostate cancer, and demonstrates that this bicalutamide dose is clinically effective when administered as part of CAB.
非甾体类抗雄激素药物氟他胺(福至尔(商标名))、尼鲁米特(安体舒通(商标名))和比卡鲁胺(康士得(商标名))被广泛用于治疗晚期前列腺癌,尤其是与去势联合使用时。天然存在的配体5α-双氢睾酮在雄激素受体上的结合亲和力高于非甾体类抗雄激素药物。比卡鲁胺对野生型大鼠和人类前列腺雄激素受体的亲和力比氟他胺的活性代谢物2-羟基氟他胺高两到四倍,比尼鲁米特高约两倍。动物研究表明,与氟他胺相比,比卡鲁胺在减轻精囊和前列腺腹侧重量以及抑制前列腺肿瘤生长方面也表现出更强的效力。尽管临床前数据可以提示可能的临床活性,但仍需要进行临床研究以确定有效且耐受性良好的给药方案。作为联合雄激素阻断(CAB)的组成部分时,对照研究表明,氟他胺加促黄体激素释放激素类似物(LHRH-A)比单独使用LHRH-A更能延长生存期;尼鲁米特加睾丸切除术比单独进行睾丸切除术更能延长生存期。其他研究未能显示出这种生存期延长的益处,包括比较氟他胺加睾丸切除术与单独睾丸切除术,以及尼鲁米特加LHRH-A与单独LHRH-A的研究。在一项直接对比研究中,将比卡鲁胺(每日一次,50毫克)与氟他胺(每日三次,250毫克)分别与LHRH-A联合使用进行比较。两种治疗方法耐受性均良好,不过更多患者无法耐受氟他胺治疗:25例接受氟他胺加LHRH-A治疗以及2例接受比卡鲁胺加LHRH-A治疗的患者因腹泻退出治疗。两种抗雄激素药物在疾病进展时间或生存期方面没有统计学上的显著差异。这项比卡鲁胺的临床试验证实了临床前研究的预测,即50毫克剂量的比卡鲁胺适用于晚期前列腺癌患者,并表明该比卡鲁胺剂量作为CAB的一部分给药时在临床上是有效的。