Suppr超能文献

耳鸣掩蔽与耳鸣再训练疗法的比较。

Comparison of tinnitus masking and tinnitus retraining therapy.

作者信息

Henry James A, Schechter Martin A, Nagler Stephen M, Fausti Stephen A

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97207, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 Nov-Dec;13(10):559-81.

Abstract

Two methods for treating tinnitus are compared. Tinnitus masking has been used for over 25 years, and although this method is used in clinics around the world, there are many misconceptions regarding the proper protocol for its clinical application. Tinnitus retraining therapy has been used clinically for over 12 years and has received considerable international attention. Although these methods are distinctive in their basic approach to tinnitus management, certain aspects of treatment appear similar. These aspects of treatment have created considerableconfusion and controversy, especially regarding the use of "sound therapy" as a basic component of treatment. It is the objective of this article to clarify the major differences that exist between these two forms of treatment.

摘要

比较了两种治疗耳鸣的方法。耳鸣掩蔽疗法已使用超过25年,尽管该方法在世界各地的诊所都有应用,但对于其临床应用的正确方案仍存在许多误解。耳鸣习服疗法已临床应用超过12年,并受到了国际上的广泛关注。尽管这些方法在治疗耳鸣的基本方法上有所不同,但治疗的某些方面似乎相似。治疗的这些方面引发了相当大的困惑和争议,尤其是在将“声音疗法”作为治疗的基本组成部分方面。本文的目的是阐明这两种治疗形式之间存在的主要差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验