Tabar L, Duffy S W, Yen M-F, Warwick J, Vitak B, Chen H-H, Smith R A
Department of Mammography, Falun Central Hospital, Sweden.
J Med Screen. 2002;9(4):159-62. doi: 10.1136/jms.9.4.159.
It has recently been suggested that all-cause mortality is a more appropriate end point than disease specific mortality in cancer screening trials, and that disease specific mortality is biased in favour of screening. This suggestion is based partly on supposed inconsistencies between all-cause mortality results and disease specific results in cancer screening trials, and alleged increases in deaths from causes other than breast cancer among breast cancer cases diagnosed among women invited to screening.
We used data from the Swedish Two-County Trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer, in which 77 080 women were randomised to an invitation to screening and 55 985 to no invitation. We estimated relative risks (RRs) (invited v control) of death from breast cancer, death from other causes within the breast cancer cases, and death from all causes within the breast cancer cases. RRs were adjusted for age and took account of the longer follow up of breast cancer cases in the invited group due to lead time.
There was a significant 31% reduction in breast cancer mortality in the invited group (RR 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.80; p<0.001). There was no significant increase in deaths from other causes among breast cancer cases in the invited group (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96-1.31; p=0.14). A significant 19% reduction in deaths from all causes was observed among breast cancer cases in the group invited to screening (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.90; p<0.001). A more conservative estimation gave a significant 13% reduction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97; p=0.01). These findings are consistent with the magnitude of the reduction in breast cancer mortality.
Invitation to screening was associated with a reduction in deaths from all causes among breast cancer cases, consistent with high participation rates in screening. There is no significant evidence of bias in cause of death classification in the Two-County Trial, and as breast cancer mortality is the targeted clinical outcome in breast cancer screening, it is the appropriate end point in a breast cancer screening trial. All-cause mortality is a poor and inefficient surrogate for breast cancer mortality.
最近有人提出,在癌症筛查试验中,全因死亡率比疾病特异性死亡率是更合适的终点指标,且疾病特异性死亡率存在有利于筛查的偏差。这一观点部分基于癌症筛查试验中全因死亡率结果与疾病特异性结果之间可能存在的不一致,以及在受邀参加筛查的女性中诊断出的乳腺癌病例中,除乳腺癌外其他原因导致的死亡人数据称有所增加。
我们使用了瑞典两县乳腺癌钼靶筛查试验的数据,该试验中77080名女性被随机分配接受筛查邀请,55985名女性未收到邀请。我们估计了乳腺癌死亡、乳腺癌病例中其他原因导致的死亡以及乳腺癌病例中全因死亡的相对风险(RRs)(受邀组对比对照组)。RRs根据年龄进行了调整,并考虑到受邀组中乳腺癌病例因领先时间而有更长的随访时间。
受邀组乳腺癌死亡率显著降低了31%(RR 0.69,95%置信区间(CI)0.58 - 0.80;p<0.001)。受邀组乳腺癌病例中其他原因导致的死亡没有显著增加(RR 1.12,95% CI 0.96 - 1.31;p = 0.14)。在受邀参加筛查的组中,乳腺癌病例的全因死亡显著降低了19%(RR 0.81,95% CI 0.72 - 0.90;p<0.001)。更保守的估计显示显著降低了13%(RR 0.87,95% CI 0.78 - 0.97;p = 0.01)。这些发现与乳腺癌死亡率降低的幅度一致。
收到筛查邀请与乳腺癌病例的全因死亡减少相关,这与筛查的高参与率一致。在两县试验中没有显著证据表明死因分类存在偏差,并且由于乳腺癌死亡率是乳腺癌筛查的目标临床结局,它是乳腺癌筛查试验的合适终点指标。全因死亡率是乳腺癌死亡率的一个不佳且低效的替代指标。