Yao Davis X, Hoda Syed A, Yin Diana Y, Kuhel William I, Harigopal Malini, Resetkova Erika, DeLellis Ronald A
Department of Pathology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Center, and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Jan;127(1):64-7. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-64-IPAPTI.
Identification of parathyroid tissue (PT) is crucial during parathyroid and thyroid surgery. Touch imprint preparation (TIP) examination is potentially a more time-effective and less labor-intensive approach than frozen section examination for identification of PT during intraoperative consultation. However, the reliability of PT-TIP remains controversial, and this fact has hindered its adoption as a replacement for frozen section examination.
To assess the factors contributing to the relative lack of reliability of TIP in a retrospective study.
Fifty randomly selected, alcohol-fixed, hematoxylin-eosin- and/or Diff-Quik-stained TIPs of specimens that had been submitted to confirm PT during intraoperative consultation were retrospectively reviewed by 5 observers. The observers were blinded to the final interpretation (based on hematoxylin-eosin-stained permanent sections), which included PT in 39 (78%) of the 50 specimens, thyroid in 9 (18%), lymph node in 1 (2%), and adipose tissue 1 (2%). Cases in which a unanimous diagnosis was not attained were re-reviewed by 3 observers.
Of 50 TIPs reviewed, a unanimous diagnosis was rendered in 33 cases (66%), including 27 (69%) of 39 PT cases, 5 (56%) of 9 thyroid cases, and the 1 lymph node case. Cytologic features observed in the TIPs that were unanimously accepted as being diagnostic of PT included the presence of small uniform cells in isolation or in small groups, round to oval nuclei, salt-and-pepper chromatin, occasional naked nuclei, and delicate vacuoles both within the cytoplasm and in the background. Re-review of the 17 remaining TIPs cases, in which diagnostic unanimity was not achieved, demonstrated that factors hindering assessment of the TIPs included hypocellularity (n = 5 cases), air-drying effect (n = 4), hemorrhagic background (n = 4), and presence of PT cells in follicular (thyroid-like) arrangements (n = 4).
The major factors influencing reliability of TIP of PT during intraoperative consultation are related primarily to interpretative problems and preparative technique. Awareness of interpretative problems and attention to preparation of TIPs may further enhance the accuracy of TIP during intraoperative consultation.
在甲状旁腺和甲状腺手术中,识别甲状旁腺组织(PT)至关重要。在术中会诊时,与冰冻切片检查相比,触摸印片制备(TIP)检查可能是一种更节省时间且劳动强度更低的识别PT的方法。然而,PT-TIP的可靠性仍存在争议,这一事实阻碍了其替代冰冻切片检查的应用。
在一项回顾性研究中评估导致TIP相对缺乏可靠性的因素。
5名观察者对50份随机选取的、经酒精固定、苏木精-伊红和/或Diff-Quik染色的TIP进行回顾性分析,这些标本是在术中会诊时送检以确认PT的。观察者对最终诊断结果(基于苏木精-伊红染色的永久切片)不知情,最终诊断结果显示,50份标本中有39份(78%)为PT,9份(18%)为甲状腺,1份(2%)为淋巴结,1份(2%)为脂肪组织。未达成一致诊断的病例由3名观察者重新评估。
在50份回顾的TIP中,33例(66%)达成了一致诊断,包括39例PT病例中的27例(69%)、9例甲状腺病例中的5例(56%)以及1例淋巴结病例。在被一致认为可诊断为PT的TIP中观察到的细胞学特征包括孤立或小群存在的小而均匀的细胞、圆形至椭圆形核、椒盐样染色质、偶尔的裸核以及细胞质内和背景中的细微空泡。对其余17例未达成诊断一致的TIP病例进行重新评估后发现,阻碍TIP评估的因素包括细胞过少(n = 5例)、风干效应(n = 4)、出血背景(n = 4)以及PT细胞呈滤泡状(甲状腺样)排列(n = 4)。
术中会诊时影响PT-TIP可靠性的主要因素主要与解释问题和制备技术有关。意识到解释问题并注意TIP的制备可能会进一步提高术中会诊时TIP的准确性。