Heravi Farzin, Omidkhoda Maryam, Koohestanian Niloufar, Hooshmand Tabassom, Bagheri Hossein, Ghaffari Negin
Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Associate Professor, Oral & Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
J Dent (Tehran). 2017 Jan;14(1):13-20.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the retentive strength of orthodontic bands cemented with amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)-containing and conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs).
One-hundred-and-twenty mandibular third molars were embedded in acrylic resin blocks with the buccal surface of crowns perpendicular to the base of the mold. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups containing 30 teeth each. Groups 1 and 3 were cemented using conventional GIC and groups 2 and 4 were cemented using ACP-containing orthodontic cement. Groups 1 and 2 without thermocycling, and groups 3 and 4 after thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5° to 55°C) were tested for retentive strength using a universal testing machine (crosshead speed of 1mm/minute). Two-way ANOVA was performed to compare the retentive strength of the groups.
The highest retentive strength belonged to group 1, and it was significantly higher than that of group 2 (P<0.001) and group 3 (P=0.02). The mean strength for group 2 was significantly lower than that of group 1 (P<0.001) and group 4 (P=0.04).
Although retentive strength decreased when ACP was added to GIC, the retentive strength of the samples cemented by ACP-containing GIC was remarkably high after thermocycling. It seems that in the oral cavity, ACP-containing GIC provides sufficient strength to endure forces applied on posterior teeth.
本研究旨在评估和比较用含无定形磷酸钙(ACP)的正畸粘固剂和传统玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)粘固的正畸带环的固位强度。
120颗下颌第三磨牙被嵌入丙烯酸树脂块中,牙冠颊面垂直于模具底部。牙齿随机分为四组,每组30颗。第1组和第3组使用传统GIC粘固,第2组和第4组使用含ACP的正畸粘固剂粘固。对第1组和第2组不进行热循环处理,对第3组和第4组进行热循环处理(5000次循环,5°至55°C)后,使用万能试验机(十字头速度为1mm/分钟)测试固位强度。进行双向方差分析以比较各组的固位强度。
固位强度最高的是第1组,显著高于第2组(P<0.001)和第3组(P=0.02)。第2组的平均强度显著低于第1组(P<0.001)和第4组(P=0.04)。
虽然向GIC中添加ACP后固位强度降低,但含ACP的GIC粘固的样本在热循环后固位强度仍非常高。在口腔中,含ACP的GIC似乎能提供足够的强度来承受施加在后牙上的力。