Rescorla Leslie, Roberts Julie
Department of Psychology, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec;45(6):1219-31. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/098).
Late talkers with normal receptive language and typically developing peers matched at 24- to 31-month intake on socieoeconomic status and nonverbal cognitive skills were compared at age 3 (N = 29, 20) and age 4 (N = 37, 16) on grammatical morpheme suppliance during speech samples. Age 4 late talkers differed from age 3 MLU-matched typically developing children on only the contractible copula. At age 4, "late bloomers" did not differ from typically developing children on any morpheme, but late talkers with "continuing delay" differed from comparison children on articles, nominative case pronouns, auxiliary be, and the contractible copula. Noun phrase morphemes were acquired earlier than verb phrase morphemes by both late talkers and comparison children, a nominal-verbal morpheme "decalage" that was first reported by R. Brown (1973). Results suggested that our late talkers did not have a selective deficit in verb morphology relative to their MLU. Findings are discussed in terms of a spectrum of SLI, with both late talkers and preschoolers with SLI hypothesized to have weaker endowments for language learning than typically developing children, but with late talkers being less impaired and thus closer to normal on this spectrum.
将接受性语言正常的说话晚的儿童与在24至31个月大时根据社会经济地位和非语言认知技能匹配的发育正常的同龄人进行比较,在3岁(N = 29, 20)和4岁(N = 37, 16)时分析他们言语样本中的语法语素供应情况。4岁的说话晚的儿童与3岁时根据平均语句长度(MLU)匹配的发育正常的儿童相比,仅在可收缩系动词方面存在差异。在4岁时,“后起之秀”在任何语素上与发育正常的儿童都没有差异,但“持续延迟”的说话晚的儿童在冠词、主格代词、助动词be和可收缩系动词方面与对照组儿童存在差异。说话晚的儿童和对照组儿童获取名词短语语素的时间都早于动词短语语素,这是一种名词 - 动词语素“时间差”,最早由R. 布朗(1973年)报道。结果表明,我们研究中的说话晚的儿童相对于他们的平均语句长度在动词形态方面不存在选择性缺陷。研究结果从一系列特定语言障碍(SLI)的角度进行了讨论,假设说话晚的儿童和患有特定语言障碍的学龄前儿童在语言学习方面的天赋都比发育正常的儿童弱,但在这个范围内,说话晚的儿童受损程度较轻,因此更接近正常水平。