• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过巨噬细胞电泳迁移率(MEM)试验测量的混合淋巴细胞反应对组织相容性进行评估。

The assessment of histocompatibility by mixed lymphocyte reaction as measured by the macrophage electrophoretic mobility (MEM) test.

作者信息

Shenton B K, Uldall P R, Swinney J, Field E J

出版信息

Tissue Antigens. 1975 May;5(4):246-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1975.tb01471.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0039.1975.tb01471.x
PMID:125469
Abstract

The mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) between donor and recipient lymphocytes has been measured by the macrophage electrophoretic mobility (MEM) test and the modified (MOD-MEM) test. Its value as a measure of compatibility has been assessed by comparison with conventional HL-A serotyping and with the outcome of renal transplantation. Thirty-six living donor/recipient pairs and 59 cadaver donor/recipient pairs for transplantation have been studied. Whilst uniovular twins gave lymphocyte interactions, measured as macrophage slowings of about 1%, the slowing produced by paired allogeneic lymphocytes ranged from 2% to 26% depending on the number of HL-A matches. The test measurement of lymphocytic interaction was significantly correlated with histocompatibility measured by HL-A serotyping, in both living and cadaver donors. One way MEM-MLR showed the dominant role of the second HL-A sublocus in mixed lymphocyte reactivity. The long term success of the renal graft correlated with the pre-transplant initial reaction between donor and recipient lymphocytes. The test has advantages in the field of human histocompatibility assessment since no particular reference to individual antigens is made and it may be performed in a matter of hours.

摘要

已通过巨噬细胞电泳迁移率(MEM)试验和改良(MOD-MEM)试验测定了供体和受体淋巴细胞之间的混合淋巴细胞反应(MLR)。通过与传统的HL-A血清分型以及肾移植结果进行比较,评估了其作为相容性指标的价值。对36对活体供体/受体和59对尸体供体/受体进行了移植研究。同卵双胞胎的淋巴细胞相互作用表现为巨噬细胞迁移速度减慢约1%,而异基因配对淋巴细胞产生的迁移速度减慢范围为2%至26%,这取决于HL-A匹配的数量。在活体和尸体供体中,淋巴细胞相互作用的试验测量值与通过HL-A血清分型测定的组织相容性显著相关。单向MEM-MLR显示了第二个HL-A亚位点在混合淋巴细胞反应性中的主导作用。肾移植的长期成功与移植前供体和受体淋巴细胞之间的初始反应相关。该试验在人类组织相容性评估领域具有优势,因为无需特别提及个体抗原,且可在数小时内完成。

相似文献

1
The assessment of histocompatibility by mixed lymphocyte reaction as measured by the macrophage electrophoretic mobility (MEM) test.通过巨噬细胞电泳迁移率(MEM)试验测量的混合淋巴细胞反应对组织相容性进行评估。
Tissue Antigens. 1975 May;5(4):246-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1975.tb01471.x.
2
Correlation between mixed lymphocyte culture in compatibility and cadaver kidney graft rejection.相容性混合淋巴细胞培养与尸体肾移植排斥反应之间的相关性。
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1977(42):40-3.
3
[Cellular immunity to donor antigens after kidney transplants in humans].[人类肾移植后对供体抗原的细胞免疫]
Z Exp Chir. 1975;8(6):350-5.
4
Possible rejection of an HL-A identical sibling renal allograft.HL-A 配型相同的同胞肾移植可能出现的排斥反应。
Med J Aust. 1976 Feb 14;1(7):195-7.
5
Prognostic value of HL-A typing and mixed lymphocyte culture tests in kidney transplantations from living related donors.HL-A分型及混合淋巴细胞培养试验在亲属活体供肾移植中的预后价值。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1975(29 Suppl):15-8.
6
The new serology of histocompatibility testing and its significance in human renal transplantation.组织相容性检测的新血清学及其在人类肾移植中的意义。
Urol Clin North Am. 1976 Oct;3(3):503-25.
7
[Immunologic selection of donors and recipients in renal graft: transplantation antigens ].肾移植中供体和受体的免疫选择:移植抗原
Nephrologie. 1982;3(2):73-9.
8
The HL-A complex in kidney transplantation.肾脏移植中的组织相容性抗原复合体。
Clin Nephrol. 1974 Jan-Feb;2(1):1-3.
9
Improved renal allograft survival using the mixed lymphocyte culture for selection of nonidentical living related donors.使用混合淋巴细胞培养法选择非同基因活体亲属供体以提高肾移植存活率。
Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1975;21:90-5.
10
MLC compatibility, HLA-D and DR typing in cadaver kidney transplantations.尸体肾移植中的MLC相容性、HLA - D和DR分型
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1980;54:32-5.