Curutchet Carles, Cramer Christopher J, Truhlar Donald G, Ruiz-López Manuel F, Rinaldi Daniel, Orozco Modesto, Luque F Javier
Departament de Fisicoquímica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avgda. Diagonal s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
J Comput Chem. 2003 Feb;24(3):284-97. doi: 10.1002/jcc.10143.
We report a systematic comparison of the electrostatic contributions to the free energy of solvation from three different kinds of quantum mechanical self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) methods. We also compare the liquid-phase dipole moments as a measure of the solute's response to the reaction field of the solvent. In particular, we compare these quantities for the generalized Born model as implemented in the SM5.42R method, the multipolar expansion model developed at Nancy, and the MST version of the polarizable continuum model. All calculations are carried out at the HF/6-31G(d) level. The effects of various choices of solute cavities and representations of the charge density are examined. The test set consists of 18 molecules containing prototypical polar groups, and three different values of the dielectric permittivity are considered.
我们报告了对三种不同类型的量子力学自洽反应场(SCRF)方法对溶剂化自由能的静电贡献的系统比较。我们还比较了液相偶极矩,以此作为溶质对溶剂反应场响应的一种度量。特别是,我们比较了在SM5.42R方法中实现的广义玻恩模型、南锡开发的多极展开模型以及极化连续介质模型的MST版本的这些量。所有计算均在HF/6 - 31G(d)水平上进行。研究了溶质空腔的各种选择和电荷密度表示的影响。测试集由18个含有典型极性基团的分子组成,并考虑了三种不同的介电常数。