Curutchet Carles, Orozco Modesto, Luque F Javier, Mennucci Benedetta, Tomasi Jacopo
Departament de Fisicoquímica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avgda. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
J Comput Chem. 2006 Nov 30;27(15):1769-80. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20480.
We report a systematic comparison of the dispersion and repulsion contributions to the free energy of solvation determined using quantum mechanical self-consistent reaction field (QM-SCRF) and classical methods. In particular, QM-SCRF computations have been performed using the dispersion and repulsion expressions developed in the framework of the integral equation formalism of the polarizable continuum model, whereas classical methods involve both empirical pairwise potential and surface-dependent approaches. Calculations have been performed for a series of aliphatic and aromatic compounds containing prototypical functional groups in four solvents: water, octanol, chloroform, and carbon tetrachloride. The analysis is focused on the dependence of the dispersion and repulsion components on the level of theory used in QM-SCRF computations, the contribution of those terms in different solvents, and the magnitude of the coupling between electrostatic and dispersion-repulsion components. Finally, comparison is made between the dispersion-repulsion contributions obtained from QM-SCRF calculations and the results determined from classical approaches.
我们报告了使用量子力学自洽反应场(QM-SCRF)和经典方法确定的溶剂化自由能中色散和排斥贡献的系统比较。具体而言,QM-SCRF计算是使用在可极化连续介质模型的积分方程形式框架中开发的色散和排斥表达式进行的,而经典方法包括经验成对势和表面相关方法。已对四种溶剂(水、辛醇、氯仿和四氯化碳)中含有典型官能团的一系列脂肪族和芳香族化合物进行了计算。分析的重点是QM-SCRF计算中使用的理论水平对色散和排斥分量的依赖性、这些项在不同溶剂中的贡献以及静电与色散-排斥分量之间的耦合强度。最后,对QM-SCRF计算得到的色散-排斥贡献与经典方法确定的结果进行了比较。