Suppr超能文献

膝关节凯尔格伦和劳伦斯1级骨赘——可疑还是确定?

Kellgren & Lawrence grade 1 osteophytes in the knee--doubtful or definite?

作者信息

Hart D J, Spector T D

机构信息

The Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Feb;11(2):149-50. doi: 10.1053/joca.2002.0853.

Abstract

The most universally accepted methods of classification of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) is the Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L) grading system. However, there have been many criticisms of this including the grading of a doubtful osteophyte as a grade 1. We report the natural history of a given prevalent grade 1 osteophyte in a 10-year follow-up knee study. 62% of women graded at baseline with a doubtful osteophyte went on to develop true osteophytic knee OA compared with only 22% of controls with no sign of disease. So called 'doubtful' osteophytes appear to be 'real' and significantly related to OA knee and therefore cannot be ignored or classified as normal.

摘要

放射学骨关节炎(OA)最被广泛接受的分类方法是凯尔格伦和劳伦斯(K&L)分级系统。然而,对此有许多批评意见,包括将可疑骨赘评为1级。我们在一项为期10年的膝关节随访研究中报告了特定的普遍存在的1级骨赘的自然史。基线时被评为可疑骨赘的女性中,62%继续发展为真正的骨赘性膝骨关节炎,而无疾病迹象的对照组中只有22%。所谓的“可疑”骨赘似乎是“真实的”,并且与膝骨关节炎显著相关,因此不能被忽视或归类为正常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验