Suppr超能文献

腰痛——一项基于社区的求医行为与治疗效果研究。

Low back pain--a community-based study of care-seeking and therapeutic effectiveness.

作者信息

Jacob T, Zeev A, Epstein L

机构信息

Zinman College of Physical Education and Sport Sciences at the Wingate Institute, Netania.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Jan 21;25(2):67-76.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe care seeking characteristics among low back pain subjects (LBP); to describe the perceived effectiveness of interventions by recipients of care for LBP; and, to discuss the gap between LBP management guidelines and actual practice in primary care.

METHODS

The population consisted of 555 subjects who were recruited from a cross sectional survey of all inhabitants of a small town in Israel. They reported 1 month LBP and were further probed regarding the characteristics of their pain and pattern of care. Data collection was performed by a self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

Some form of care was sought by 78.7% of the participants. More than half (58%) visited a physician, 34.4% were prescribed drug therapy, 37.1% attended physical therapy and 28.6% turned to alternative medicine. Participants with severe pain were more likely to seek care. That was demonstrated by all pain measures (e.g. high Roland and Morris disability scores (8.2+/-5.6 vs 4.4+/-4.1), high symptoms frequency (8.9+/-4.1 vs 7.5+/-3.6) and high pain severity scores (5.6+/-2.2 vs 4.5+/-1.7)). The intervention perceived to be most effective was alternative medicine (graded as 'effective' or 'very effective' by 62.8%), followed by therapeutic exercise programmes (56.9%), bed rest (51.9%) and physical therapy (46.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals reporting severe LBP were more likely to seek care. The treatment utilities perceived to be most effective were alternative medicine and therapeutic exercises, whereas the least effective were physicians' office visits. A gap was found between clinical guidelines and physicians referrals for other therapeutic interventions.

摘要

目的

描述腰痛患者的就医特征;描述腰痛患者对所接受干预措施的感知效果;并探讨腰痛管理指南与初级保健实际做法之间的差距。

方法

研究对象为555名从以色列一个小镇所有居民的横断面调查中招募的受试者。他们报告有1个月的腰痛,并进一步询问了疼痛特征和就医模式。数据收集通过自行填写问卷进行。

结果

78.7%的参与者寻求了某种形式的治疗。超过一半(58%)的人看了医生,34.4%的人接受了药物治疗,37.1%的人接受了物理治疗,28.6%的人求助于替代医学。疼痛严重的参与者更有可能寻求治疗。所有疼痛指标均表明了这一点(例如,罗兰和莫里斯残疾评分较高(8.2±5.6对4.4±4.1)、症状频率较高(8.9±4.1对7.5±3.6)以及疼痛严重程度评分较高(5.6±2.2对4.5±1.7))。被认为最有效的干预措施是替代医学(62.8%的人评为“有效”或“非常有效”),其次是治疗性锻炼计划(56.9%)、卧床休息(51.9%)和物理治疗(46.8%)。

结论

报告严重腰痛的个体更有可能寻求治疗。被认为最有效的治疗方法是替代医学和治疗性锻炼,而最无效的是看医生。在临床指南与医生对其他治疗干预措施的转诊之间发现了差距。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验