Rosenau Pauline Vaillancourt, Linder Stephen H
Department of Management and Policy Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, 77225, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Feb;54(2):183-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.2.183.
The authors synthesized evidence from a systematic review of the literature reporting substantiated performance differences between private for-profit and private nonprofit psychiatric inpatient care providers in the United States since 1980. They also compared reported differences in performance between nonprofit and for-profit inpatient psychiatric care providers with reported differences between nonprofit and for-profit providers of other types of health care.
Studies were located by means of computerized bibliographic searches and follow-up searches of studies cited in the articles located in the computerized search. The analysis included peer-reviewed studies that compared the performance of for-profit and nonprofit health service providers, including inpatient psychiatric services, in the areas of access, quality, cost-efficiency, and amount of charity care on the basis of quantitative data collected after 1980. The studies were classified in one of three categories according to the study conclusion: for-profit superiority, nonprofit superiority, or no difference or mixed results.
Almost all studies (with one exception) found that the nonprofit psychiatric providers performed as well as or better than their for-profit counterparts. The proportion of studies reporting performance superiority of nonprofit versus for-profit psychiatric inpatient providers was greater than the proportion of studies reporting the same conclusion for providers of all other types of health care taken together.
On the basis of data collected since 1980, nonprofit psychiatric inpatient care providers in the United States had superior performance on access, quality, cost-efficiency, and amount of charity care, compared with for-profit providers. Caution is warranted in pursuing public policies that permit or encourage the replacement of nonprofit psychiatric inpatient care providers with for-profit providers of these services.
作者对自1980年以来美国营利性和非营利性私立精神病住院护理机构之间经证实的绩效差异的文献进行了系统综述,并综合了相关证据。他们还将非营利性和营利性住院精神病护理机构之间报告的绩效差异与非营利性和营利性其他类型医疗保健机构之间报告的差异进行了比较。
通过计算机化书目检索以及对计算机检索中找到的文章所引用研究的后续检索来查找研究。分析包括同行评审研究,这些研究根据1980年以后收集的定量数据,比较了营利性和非营利性医疗服务提供者(包括住院精神病服务)在可及性、质量、成本效益和慈善护理量等方面的绩效。这些研究根据研究结论分为三类之一:营利性机构占优、非营利性机构占优、无差异或结果混合。
几乎所有研究(有一项例外)都发现,非营利性精神病护理机构的表现与营利性机构相当或更好。报告非营利性住院精神病护理机构绩效优于营利性机构的研究比例,高于报告所有其他类型医疗保健机构的提供者有相同结论的研究比例之和。
根据1980年以来收集的数据,与营利性机构相比,美国非营利性住院精神病护理机构在可及性、质量、成本效益和慈善护理量方面表现更优。在推行允许或鼓励用营利性机构取代非营利性住院精神病护理机构的公共政策时,需要谨慎行事。