Suppr超能文献

接种流感疫苗和肺炎球菌感染疫苗的队列与未接种疫苗的队列之间的比较。

Comparison between cohorts vaccinated and unvaccinated against influenza and pneumococcal infection.

作者信息

Christenson B, Lundbergh P

机构信息

Department of Communicable Diseases Control and Prevention, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2002 Dec;129(3):515-24. doi: 10.1017/s095026880200780x.

Abstract

This study characterizes possible confounders that might make cohorts vaccinated and unvaccinated against influenza and pneumococcal infection different at baseline, with the hypothesis that the two cohorts are comparable. The similarity between health and demographic data was analysed by a randomized, multivariant study addressed to 10,000 persons aged 65 years and older in Stockholm County and was carried out in the form of a postal inquiry during the period December 2000 to May 2001. The study-population response rate was 78%. Of these, 66% (5,120 persons) had been given at least one influenza vaccination during the 3-year study period (1998-2000), 50% (3,780) had received one pneumococcal vaccination and 78% had received both vaccines during the period. The vaccination rate was lower in the age group 65-69 years (60%), compared with elderly cohorts aged over 70 years (67-72%, P < 0.001). Elderly persons living in nursing homes or institutions had higher vaccination rates than persons living in their own households (72 vs. 67%). Persons with underlying chronic diseases had higher vaccination rates (71%, P < 0.001) than those without underlying chronic diseases. Vaccine recipients had fewer days in hospital, compared with non-recipients. Unvaccinated persons with myocardial disease had nine times more days in hospital than vaccinated persons with myocardial disease. Vaccination against pneumococcal infection had an additional effect with influenza vaccination in reducing hospitalization for chronic lung diseases; influenza vaccination alone did not have this effect. In conclusion, the influenza and pneumococcal-vaccine recipients were older and had significantly more chronic lung and heart conditions than the unvaccinated cohort.

摘要

本研究对可能造成混杂的因素进行了特征描述,这些因素可能会使接种流感疫苗和肺炎球菌疫苗的队列在基线时有所不同,研究假设这两个队列具有可比性。通过一项针对斯德哥尔摩县10000名65岁及以上人群的随机多变量研究,分析了健康和人口数据之间的相似性,该研究于2000年12月至2001年5月期间以邮寄调查的形式开展。研究人群的应答率为78%。其中,66%(5120人)在3年研究期(1998 - 2000年)内至少接种过一次流感疫苗,50%(3780人)接种过一次肺炎球菌疫苗,78%的人在此期间两种疫苗都接种过。65 - 69岁年龄组的接种率(60%)低于70岁以上的老年队列(67 - 72%,P < 0.001)。居住在养老院或机构中的老年人接种率高于住在自己家中的人(72%对67%)。患有潜在慢性病的人接种率(71%,P < 0.001)高于无潜在慢性病的人。与未接种者相比,接种疫苗者的住院天数更少。患有心肌病的未接种者的住院天数比患有心肌病的接种者多9倍。接种肺炎球菌疫苗对流感疫苗在降低慢性肺病住院率方面有额外作用;单独接种流感疫苗则没有这种效果。总之,与未接种队列相比,接种流感疫苗和肺炎球菌疫苗的人年龄更大,患有慢性肺病和心脏病的情况也明显更多。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly.用于预防老年人流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD004876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004876.pub4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验