Suppr超能文献

只有可逆转的植物神经症状才能定义非典型抑郁症吗?

Can only reversed vegetative symptoms define atypical depression?

作者信息

Benazzi Franco

机构信息

Outpatient Psychiatry Center, Ravenna and Forli, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002 Dec;252(6):288-93. doi: 10.1007/s00406-002-0395-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The definition of atypical depression (AD) has recently seen a rebirth of studies, as the evidence supporting the current DSM-IV atypical features criteria is weak. Study aim was to compare a definition of AD requiring only oversleeping and overeating (reversed vegetative symptoms) to the DSM-IV AD definition (always requiring mood reactivity, plus overeating/weight gain, oversleeping, leaden paralysis, and interpersonal sensitivity [at least 2]).

METHODS

Consecutive 202 major depressive disorder (MDD) and 281 bipolar II outpatients were interviewed, during a major depressive episode (MDE), with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. The DSM-IV criteria for AD were compared to a new AD definition based only on oversleeping and overeating, which was the one often used in community studies. Associations were tested by univariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The frequency of DSM-IV AD was 42.8 %, and that of the new AD definition was 38.7 %. DSM-IV AD, and the new AD definition, had almost all the same significant associations: bipolar II, female gender, lower age, lower age of onset, axis I comorbidity, depressive mixed state, MDE symptoms lasting more than 2 years, and bipolar family history. DSM-IV AD was present in 86 % of the new AD definition sample. The new definition of AD was significantly associated with all the other DSM-IV AD symptoms not included in it. The new AD definition was strongly associated with DSM-IV AD (odds ratio = 17.8), and had sensitivity = 77.7 %, specificity = 90.5 %, positive predictive value = 86.1 %, negative predictive value = 84.4 %, and ROC area curve = 0.85, for predicting DSM-IV AD.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support a simpler definition of AD, requiring only oversleeping and overeating, and support the similar AD definition previously used in community studies. This definition is easier and quicker to assess by clinicians than the DSM-IV definition (mood reactivity and interpersonal sensitivity are more difficult to assess). Some pharmacological studies support this new AD definition (by showing better response to MAOI than to TCA, as shown in DSM-IV AD).

摘要

背景

非典型抑郁症(AD)的定义最近迎来了研究热潮,因为支持当前《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)非典型特征标准的证据并不充分。研究目的是将仅要求存在睡眠过多和暴饮暴食(反向植物神经症状)的AD定义与DSM-IV的AD定义进行比较(后者始终要求具备心境反应性,以及暴饮暴食/体重增加、睡眠过多、铅样麻痹和人际敏感性[至少两项])。

方法

在重度抑郁发作(MDE)期间,使用DSM-IV的结构化临床访谈对202名连续的重度抑郁症(MDD)门诊患者和281名双相II型障碍门诊患者进行访谈。将DSM-IV的AD标准与仅基于睡眠过多和暴饮暴食的新AD定义进行比较,后者是社区研究中常用的定义。通过单变量逻辑回归检验相关性。

结果

DSM-IV的AD发生率为42.8%,新AD定义的发生率为38.7%。DSM-IV的AD和新AD定义几乎具有所有相同的显著相关性:双相II型障碍、女性、年龄较小、起病年龄较低、轴I共病、抑郁混合状态、MDE症状持续超过2年以及双相家族史。新AD定义样本中有86%存在DSM-IV的AD。新的AD定义与所有未包含在其中的其他DSM-IV的AD症状显著相关。新的AD定义与DSM-IV的AD密切相关(优势比=17.8),在预测DSM-IV的AD方面,其敏感性为77.7%,特异性为90.5%,阳性预测值为86.1%,阴性预测值为84.4%,ROC曲线下面积为0.85。

结论

研究结果支持对AD采用更简单的定义,即仅要求睡眠过多和暴饮暴食,并支持社区研究中先前使用的类似AD定义。与DSM-IV定义相比(心境反应性和人际敏感性更难评估),临床医生评估这个定义更容易、更快捷。一些药理学研究支持这个新AD定义(通过显示对单胺氧化酶抑制剂[MAOI]的反应优于三环类抗抑郁药[TCA],如DSM-IV的AD所示)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验