• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用神经网络衍生的决策模型预测创伤性伤口感染

Prediction of traumatic wound infection with a neural network-derived decision model.

作者信息

Lammers Richard L, Hudson Donna L, Seaman Matthew E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University/Kalamazoo Center for Medical Studies, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;21(1):1-7. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2003.50026.

DOI:10.1053/ajem.2003.50026
PMID:12563571
Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a decision model, using an artificial neural network, that predicts infection in uncomplicated, traumatic, sutured wounds. The study was a prospective, cohort study of all patients presenting to the emergency department of a county teaching hospital with uncomplicated wounds that required suturing. In evaluating and treating wounds, emergency medicine (EM) faculty and residents, resident physicians in primary-care specialties, and supervised medical students on EM clerkships followed a standardized wound-management protocol. Clinicians estimated the likelihood of subsequent infection using a 5-point scale. Wound healing was followed until sutures were removed. Wound outcome data were collected by medical personnel blinded to the initial prediction. Student's t-tests and Pearson's chi-square statistic were used to identify independent predictors that served as input variables. Wound infection was the single output variable. Neural network analysis was used to assign weights to input variables and derive a decision equation. A total of 1,142 wounds were analyzed in the study. The overall infection rate was 7.2%. The most predictive factors for wound infection were wound location, wound age, depth, configuration, contamination, and patient age. To derive a decision equation for the model, the network was trained on data from half of the subjects and tested on the remainder. When used as a diagnostic test for wound infection, the decision model had a sensitivity of 70%, as compared to 54% for physicians, and a specificity of 76%, as compared to 78% for physicians. We conclude that through the use of combinations of 7 clinical variables available at the time of initial wound management, a neural network-derived decision model may be used to identify uncomplicated, traumatic wounds at higher risk for infection.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发并验证一种使用人工神经网络的决策模型,该模型可预测单纯性创伤缝合伤口的感染情况。本研究是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为所有到某县教学医院急诊科就诊、有需要缝合的单纯性伤口的患者。在评估和治疗伤口时,急诊医学(EM)教员和住院医师、初级保健专科的住院医师以及在EM实习中接受监督的医学生遵循标准化的伤口管理方案。临床医生使用5分制评估后续感染的可能性。伤口愈合情况一直跟踪到缝线拆除。伤口结局数据由对初始预测不知情的医务人员收集。使用学生t检验和Pearson卡方统计量来确定作为输入变量的独立预测因素。伤口感染是唯一的输出变量。使用神经网络分析为输入变量分配权重并推导决策方程。本研究共分析了1142个伤口。总体感染率为7.2%。伤口感染的最具预测性的因素是伤口位置、伤口时长、深度、形态、污染情况和患者年龄。为了推导该模型的决策方程,该网络使用一半受试者的数据进行训练,并在其余受试者上进行测试。当用作伤口感染的诊断测试时,该决策模型的灵敏度为70%,而医生的灵敏度为54%;特异性为76%,而医生的特异性为78%。我们得出结论,通过使用伤口初始处理时可用的7个临床变量的组合,基于神经网络得出的决策模型可用于识别感染风险较高的单纯性创伤伤口。

相似文献

1
Prediction of traumatic wound infection with a neural network-derived decision model.利用神经网络衍生的决策模型预测创伤性伤口感染
Am J Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;21(1):1-7. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2003.50026.
2
Comparison between logistic regression and neural networks to predict death in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency room.逻辑回归与神经网络在预测急诊室疑似脓毒症患者死亡情况方面的比较。
Crit Care. 2005 Apr;9(2):R150-6. doi: 10.1186/cc3054. Epub 2005 Feb 17.
3
Artificial neural networks for predicting failure to survive following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.用于预测院内心肺复苏后生存失败的人工神经网络
J Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;36(3):297-303.
4
Application of an artificial neural network model to predict delayed decrease of serum creatinine in pediatric patients after kidney transplantation.
Transplant Proc. 2007 Jul-Aug;39(6):1813-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.05.026.
5
A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.一个有助于急性胃肠道出血患者管理的决策支持系统。
Artif Intell Med. 2008 Mar;42(3):247-59. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
6
Level of training, wound care practices, and infection rates.
Am J Emerg Med. 1995 May;13(3):265-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90197-3.
7
Artificial neural network as a predictive instrument in patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.人工神经网络作为急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的预测工具
Gastroenterology. 2008 Jan;134(1):65-74. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.037. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
8
Artificial neural network versus subjective scoring in predicting mortality in trauma patients.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:1019-24.
9
Application of artificial neural networks to establish a predictive mortality risk model in children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit.应用人工神经网络建立儿科重症监护病房收治儿童的死亡风险预测模型。
Singapore Med J. 2006 Nov;47(11):928-34.
10
Can we improve the prediction of stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? A neural network or a statistical model?我们能否改善输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除状态的预测?神经网络还是统计模型?
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):175-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000128646.20349.27.

引用本文的文献

1
Sabbath Observance and Delayed Primary Repair of Lacerations: Experience from a Plastic Surgery Practice.安息日遵守与裂伤的延迟一期修复:来自整形外科实践的经验。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 10;12(9):e6148. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006148. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Time to wound closure in facial soft tissue injuries following road traffic accidents.交通事故后面部软组织损伤的伤口闭合时间。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jun;21(6):e14910. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14910.
3
Does the use of surgical face masks reduce postoperative infections in traumatic wounds sutured outside hospital? A randomized study at a Norwegian casualty center.
外科口罩的使用是否能降低院外创伤缝合术后感染?挪威急救中心的一项随机研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Jun;42(2):287-294. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2315438. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Risk factors for revision surgery in operative treatment of traumatic injuries of the olecranon and prepatellar bursa.创伤性鹰嘴和髌前滑囊炎手术治疗中翻修手术的风险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 23;23(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05980-9.
5
Is the use of specific time cut-off or "golden period" for primary closure of acute traumatic wounds evidence based? A systematic review.急性创伤性伤口一期缝合时使用特定的时间截点或“黄金时间”是否有循证医学证据?一项系统评价。
Croat Med J. 2021 Dec 31;62(6):614-622. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2021.62.614.
6
Potential of machine learning to predict early ischemic events after carotid endarterectomy or stenting: a comparison with surgeon predictions.机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术后早期缺血事件的潜力:与外科医生预测的比较。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Feb;45(1):607-616. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01573-7. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: A scoping review.急诊医学中的人工智能:一项范围综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Nov 7;1(6):1691-1702. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12277. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Management of Acute Skin Trauma.美国国家运动训练师协会立场声明:急性皮肤创伤的管理
J Athl Train. 2016 Dec;51(12):1053-1070. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.7.01. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
9
Antibiotic prophylaxis for oral lacerations: our emergency department's experience.口腔撕裂伤的抗生素预防:我们急诊科的经验。
Int J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12245-016-0122-7. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
10
The risk of wound infection after simple hand laceration.单纯手部裂伤后感染的风险。
World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(1):44-7. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.01.008.