Brunner Hermine I, Feldman Brian M, Urowitz Murray B, Gladman Dafna D
William Rowe Division of Rheumatology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039, USA.
J Rheumatol. 2003 Feb;30(2):292-7.
To develop Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Disease Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI) item weightings that improve the ability of the measure to predict patient mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Disease damage was measured for 738 patients followed at the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic since diagnosis. Using Rasch analysis, item weightings were determined and tested for their ability to predict death in a logistic regression model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were produced to compare the original and weighted scales' ability to discriminate patients that died during the followup period from those who remained alive.
The average SLICC/ACR-DI score per patient was 1.66. In total, 138 of the patients died during a mean followup of 9.2 years. A Rasch analysis derived weighting scheme using weighted domain scores (SLICC/ACR-DI-weighted) was the best weighted scale, with item reliability = 94%, model mean square infit = 1.01 (STD = 0.05); model mean square outfit = 0.99 (STD = 0.3), separation 4.08. The SLICC/ACR-DI-weighted was modestly better than the SLICC/ACR-DI in discriminating patients who died from those who remained alive. Using standardized scores for comparability, the SLICC/ACR-DI-weighted was better in predicting patient death than the unweighted SLICC/ACR-DI [OR(death)(SLICC/ACR-DI-weighted) = 1.7 vs OR(death)(SLICC-ACR-DI) = 1.4; p < 0.005]. ROC curve analysis supports that the SLICC/ACR-DI-weighted was somewhat superior to the SLICC/ACR-DI for predicting mortality.
In this test set, the SLICC/ACR-DI-weighted was modestly better in predicting death than the traditional unweighted SLICC/ACR-DI. However, the SLICC/ACR-DI-weighted is more difficult to apply and the weightings appear not to have provided a clinically relevant improvement of the SLICC-ACR-DI.
制定系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心/美国风湿病学会疾病损伤指数(SLICC/ACR-DI)的项目权重,以提高该指标预测系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者死亡率的能力。
对自诊断以来在多伦多大学狼疮诊所随访的738例患者进行疾病损伤评估。使用Rasch分析确定项目权重,并在逻辑回归模型中测试其预测死亡的能力。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以比较原始量表和加权量表区分随访期间死亡患者与存活患者的能力。
每位患者的平均SLICC/ACR-DI评分为1.66。在平均9.2年的随访期间,共有138例患者死亡。使用加权领域得分(SLICC/ACR-DI加权)的Rasch分析得出的权重方案是最佳加权量表,项目信度=94%,模型均方内拟合=1.01(标准差=0.05);模型均方外拟合=0.99(标准差=0.3),区分度4.08。在区分死亡患者与存活患者方面,SLICC/ACR-DI加权量表略优于SLICC/ACR-DI量表。使用标准化分数进行可比性比较时,SLICC/ACR-DI加权量表在预测患者死亡方面优于未加权的SLICC/ACR-DI[OR(死亡)(SLICC/ACR-DI加权)=1.7,而OR(死亡)(SLICC-ACR-DI)=1.4;p<0.005]。ROC曲线分析支持SLICC/ACR-DI加权量表在预测死亡率方面略优于SLICC/ACR-DI量表。
在该测试集中,SLICC/ACR-DI加权量表在预测死亡方面略优于传统的未加权SLICC/ACR-DI量表。然而,SLICC/ACR-DI加权量表更难应用,且权重似乎并未在临床上对SLICC-ACR-DI量表带来显著改善。