Nossent J C
Department of Medicine, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Willemstad, Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles.
J Rheumatol. 1998 Apr;25(4):654-9.
To apply the recently described Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI) in a well defined cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to study its association with disease activity, corticosteroid therapy, and prognosis.
We conducted a record review of 90 patients with SLE followed at a single center for a mean period of 6 years with periodic evaluations of SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), cumulative damage according to SLICC/ACR-DI, and therapy. Overall disease activity during the disease course was calculated as weighted averages of SLEDAI (WAS).
Mean SLICC/ACR-DI was 0.6 six months after diagnosis and increased to 2.4 at last assessment. Thirteen patients (14%) remained free of accumulated damage at last visit. Index scores showed significant correlations with WAS scores and the number of disease exacerbations (SLEDAI > 10), but not with age, mean daily, or cumulative corticosteroid dosage. High WAS scores were independently associated with poorer survival, but SLICC/ACR-DI scores were not.
SLICC/ACR-DI scores correlate with overall disease activity, but not with length or intensity of corticosteroid therapy. While easily applicable, its prognostic value is subordinate to that of persistent disease activity.
在一个明确界定的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者队列中应用最近描述的系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床/美国风湿病学会损伤指数(SLICC/ACR-DI),并研究其与疾病活动、糖皮质激素治疗及预后的关系。
我们对90例SLE患者进行了记录回顾,这些患者在单一中心随访平均6年,定期评估SLE疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)、根据SLICC/ACR-DI计算的累积损伤以及治疗情况。疾病过程中的总体疾病活动度以SLEDAI的加权平均值(WAS)计算。
诊断后6个月时平均SLICC/ACR-DI为0.6,最后一次评估时增至2.4。13例患者(14%)在最后一次就诊时仍无累积损伤。指数评分与WAS评分及疾病加重次数(SLEDAI>10)显著相关,但与年龄、每日平均或累积糖皮质激素剂量无关。高WAS评分与较差的生存率独立相关,但SLICC/ACR-DI评分则不然。
SLICC/ACR-DI评分与总体疾病活动度相关,但与糖皮质激素治疗的时长或强度无关。虽然易于应用,但其预后价值低于持续的疾病活动度。